I AM DOING A MOCK TRIAL CASE ON THE RV HUDSON CASE TOMORROW. I am acting as the expert Doctor (Doctor. J. Tyrone). i have 12 direct examination qquestions from somebody in my group that i have too answer. These are the questions:

1. please state your name for the jury.

2. Can you please tell the jury your credit and shoes and background in the medical field?

3. How did you first feel when Michael’s case was brought to you, and it was suggested that he could be sleepwalking?

4. What did you conclude?

5. How did you come to this conclusion?

6. What tests did you run on Michael?

7. Did anything stand out to you while you were running these tests?

8. as Michael had mentioned, he has a history of sleepwalking from when he was younger. What kind of role does this fact play in this situation?

9. What does Michael’s family history of sleepwalking suggest?

10. What can you say about Michael sleepwalking in general?

11. what would you say should be done to help treat Michael?

12. Would you say it’s likely that hill repeat this sort of behaviour, if given proper treatment?

THE Picture that I have provided above is the doctors script, so please when you answer the question stick to the script but you can also add any additional Information to make it sound better, and to make my team win. PLEASE HURRY I NEED THIS ASAP!!!!!! please make sure it’s had a great 12 university level information.

I am doing a assignment for a law class where I have to write. Cross examination questions. The questions are based on the R.v Hudson case automatism. (the case about Michael Hudson, who drove 27 km to his in-laws home and he killed his mother-in-law and seriously injured his father-in-law but then he claims that he was sleepwalking.) you can read more about this case on Google and then do this for me.

So I am cross examining constable kramer which is on the defence team.

Cross examination consist in interrogating the opposite parties witness who has already testified (for example, direct examination) it may be followed by a re-direct examination. The scope of cross examination is checking, or discrediting the witnesses testimony, knowledge or credibility. And preparing your cross examination, you should focus on the fact that will help prove your case. Your questions on Cross should be leading giving the witness very little to no opportunity to explain his/her/their views.

task:

1. choose one witness from the other side. (we are doing constable kramer)

2. Compose cross examination questions for that witness make sure that your questions are open and type questions.

3. Minimum 10 questions for that witness

THE PICTURES BELOW IS AN EXAMPLE OF A CROSS EXAMINATION TO HELP YOU:

Hi. I am doing a mock trial in law and i am on the defence team. I am playing the a expert doctors role (Defence witness: Dr. J. Tyrone). The picture below is my script.

The case is the automatism case on Michael Hudson.

https://lawlessons.ca/sites/default/files/2022-06/RvHudson.pdf

This link above is the case you can read and understand what happened

Can you please provide me with stuff i can add to my script. By any stuff i mean scientific proven stuff to defend Michael Hudson. I need smart scientific stuff to make my team win please help me I need it to be so good i need my team to win

Please provide me with smart scientific things to backup my point and script and to prove the prosecution wrong and to get 100%

• Tom is charged with murdering his next-door neighbour with a snow shovel and has been detained in custody awaiting his trial. Although there is no known history of mental illness, as his trial is approaching his defence lawyer, Jane finds it increasingly difficult to speak to her client. Tom’s answers to questions posed by Jane have nothing to do with what she is asking. Tom tells Jane that spirits are talking to him in his cell, and he sees visions of his Great Grandmother walking by his side and constantly talking to him. Jane asks Tom if he understands what would happen if he is found guilty of murder, and Tom’s response has nothing to do with his potential jeopardy. The trial is scheduled to commence in a week. As Tom’s lawyer, which argument should Jane be considering to raise before the trial begins? Your answer should include the appropriate section(s) of the Criminal Code that apply. (5 marks)