6
answers
1
watching
164
views
astrayLv1
4 Mar 2023
Consider the sentences below, which give us more information about the distribution of hans. Above you concluded that hans was either an anaphor or a pronoun. Explain whether the sentences below are consistent with your conclusion or not.
1) Dave(k) spiste hans( j/∗k) mat.
Dave ate POSS . HANS food
‘Dave ate his food.’
2) Daves(i) far(k) spiste hans(i/∗k) mat.
Dave’s father ate POSS . HANS food
‘Dave’s dad ate his food.’
In light of your conclusion, consider the English sentences in (3). Explain why it’s hard to identify his as a strict anaphor or pronoun.
(3a) Dave(k) said that Natasha(i) ate his(k) food.
b) Dave(k) ate his(k) food.
Consider the sentences below, which give us more information about the distribution of hans. Above you concluded that hans was either an anaphor or a pronoun. Explain whether the sentences below are consistent with your conclusion or not.
1) Dave(k) spiste hans( j/∗k) mat.
Dave ate POSS . HANS food
‘Dave ate his food.’
2) Daves(i) far(k) spiste hans(i/∗k) mat.
Dave’s father ate POSS . HANS food
‘Dave’s dad ate his food.’
In light of your conclusion, consider the English sentences in (3). Explain why it’s hard to identify his as a strict anaphor or pronoun.
(3a) Dave(k) said that Natasha(i) ate his(k) food.
b) Dave(k) ate his(k) food.
Liked by astray and 1 others
nicolaidoscopeLv10
5 Mar 2023
Liked by astray and 1 others
Liked by astray and 2 others
souravshit53Lv6
5 Mar 2023
Already have an account? Log in
Liked by astray and 1 others
celluarsolLv10
5 Mar 2023
Already have an account? Log in
Liked by astray and 3 others
Liked by astray and 2 others
rachidbouhaLv4
5 Mar 2023
Already have an account? Log in