1
answer
0
watching
58
views
25 Aug 2019
I've been reading a bit about "junk DNA" and how much of ourgenome consists of this "non coding DNA" in comparison to "codingDNA".
I'm just an interested layperson but I thought all combinationsof three base pairs encoded one amino acid, with some amino acidsbeing encoded by more than one combination of base pairs.
But if that were true then all of our DNA would encodesomething.
Or if only a tiny percentage of our DNA is "coding" that wouldmean that the vast majority of possible combinations of three basepairs don't represent any amino acid.
Or it could mean that there are a small number of "meaningless"combinations of three base pairs, but that those combinations arevastly overrepresented in our genome.
Which is correct? What am I missing?
I've been reading a bit about "junk DNA" and how much of ourgenome consists of this "non coding DNA" in comparison to "codingDNA".
I'm just an interested layperson but I thought all combinationsof three base pairs encoded one amino acid, with some amino acidsbeing encoded by more than one combination of base pairs.
But if that were true then all of our DNA would encodesomething.
Or if only a tiny percentage of our DNA is "coding" that wouldmean that the vast majority of possible combinations of three basepairs don't represent any amino acid.
Or it could mean that there are a small number of "meaningless"combinations of three base pairs, but that those combinations arevastly overrepresented in our genome.
Which is correct? What am I missing?
Hubert KochLv2
27 Aug 2019