Log in
Biology
1
answer
0
watching
122
views
28 Jul 2019

I need different answer:

Discuss the concept of Renaissance Humanism. Explain, in your own words, what humanism is/was.

- Who were the humanists?

- What values did they espouse and what were their goals?

- In your opinion what has been the influence of humanism in shaping the modern world?

- Has that influence been positive or negative?

Watch
1
answer
0
watching
122
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Irving Heathcote
Irving HeathcoteLv2
30 Jul 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related textbook solutions

Molecular Cell Biology
8 Edition,
Lodish
ISBN: 9781464183393
Biology: Science for Life with Physiology
6 Edition,
Belk
ISBN: 9780134555430
Concepts of Biology
OER Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781938168116
Biology
2nd Edition, 2013
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172517
Essentials of Biology
5 Edition,
Mader
ISBN: 9781259660269

Related questions

1. What was Darwin's theory of pangenesis and how did it fit his model of blending inheritance? How did it allow for the influence of the environment on hereditary characters?

2. How was the idea of environmental influence criticized by Weismann? What his idea of "germ plasm"?

3. What were Mendel's laws on the segregation of traits and on recessive and dominant traits? How did he support these ideas with evidence?

4. What was Galton's argument regarding the inheritance of genius and how did he attempt to prove it?

1. What is the definition of eugenics? What is the difference between positive and negative eugenics?

2. What was "feeblemindedness"? Why did scientists want to eliminate these people from the population?

3. What was the argument presented for sterilization based on the Jukes family history?

4. How was feeblemindedness portrayed in the Norton pamphlet on “Selective Sterilization in Primer Form”?

5. How does the Carrie Buck case illustrate the concerns of eugenecists? How does it illustrate social values of the time?

1. What was the Kallikak family study, and how did it differ from the Jukes family study? What were its conclusions?

2. What were five factors that contributed to a growing concern over immigration and its threat to "nativism." (Be sure you know what American nativism was.)

3. What was the Immigration Restriction Act? How did passage of the act further eugenic goals?

4. How were eugenic doctrines popularized? What are some examples of positive eugenics?

5. What is the concept of "mental age" on which the Binet test was based? What did early researchers think they were measuring with these tests?

1. What were the results of the I.Q. test administered to World War I draftees? How did some people criticize this test and its results?

2. How did increasing research on development and genetics call into question the simple unit-character assumptions of earlier eugenecists?

3. What concerns did German “racial hygienists” express about different birthrates among Germans, Slavic peoples, and southern Europeans?

4. How was the rise of National Socialism (Nazism) in Germany based on promoting the genetically “healthy” and preventing reproduction among the “unhealthy”? Who was included in the unhealthy category?

5. What was the purpose of the German “health courts”? How did U.S. sterilization laws serve as models for German sterilization programs?

1. How were Margaret Sanger’s view on birth control similar to and different from eugenics?

2. What were the fears over the “population explosion” in the 1960s?

3.What similarities are there between the case of the Relf sisters and Madrigal vs. Quilligan?

4. How were sterilizations in the 1960s and 1970s similar to and different from the eugenic sterilizations of the 1920s and 1930s?

5. Why were so many women sterilized in Puerto Rico?

1. What are the basic particles of the atom? What is an isotope?

2. What were the contributions of Roentgen, Becquerel, and Marie Curie to the discovery of radioactivity?

3. How did Rutherford explain radioactive decay (Experiment 1)? How are atoms of one element transmuted into another element during radioactive decay?

4. What was Thompson’s model of the atom? What was Rutherford's model and how did he prove he was right (Experiment 2)?

5. What is the basic idea behind a nuclear chain reaction (fission)? Be able to explain 92235U → 56142Ba + 3691Kr + 3 neutrons + energy.

6. What were the circumstances that led Einstein to write to Roosevelt? What did he tell him?

1. How did the timing of the various decisions about deciding to make a bomb, making the bomb, and deciding to drop it coincide with the course of World War II? 2. What effect did the death of Roosevelt have on the decision to drop the bomb?

3. How did the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union affect the decision to drop the bomb?

4. In what ways did Bohr, Szilard, and Franck try to get the politicians to think about the consequences of dropping the bomb? What were their various recommendations about international control?

5. How was the Interim Committee involved in the decision to drop the bomb? Which scientists advised the committee and what did they recommend?

1. How did Oppenheimer's attitudes toward the atomic bomb change over his lifetime? After the war was over, what was he advocating in relation to the bomb?

2. What were the reasons for and against initiating the project to build the atomic bomb? Did these reasons change during the course of the war?

3. What were the reasons in 1945 for and against dropping the bomb in a surprise attack?

4. With the benefit of hindsight, of more knowledge about the actual state of Japan in 1945, and of further understanding about the effects of the bomb, do you still think that the reasons you suggested in answer to question 3 are valid? Do you think there was any way to have done things differently?

1. How did the United States people first learn of the bombing of Hiroshima? What were they told?

2. What alternative to using the bomb was always mentioned by those justifying the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

3. What was the Potsdam ultimatum and how did the Japanese respond? Why did they reject it?

4. What possibilities for a negotiated peace settlement with Japan existed during the summer of 1945? Why were they unsuccessful?

5. When and how did the American public first begin to learn about the effects of the bombings on the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

1. What were some of the reactions of scientists to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

2. What were the major concerns of scientists after the war regarding the development and control of nuclear weapons?

3. How did the events of the Cold War influence the development of the Hydrogen Bomb?

4. What was the recommendation of the General Advisory Committee concerning the H-bomb, and on what reasons was it based?

1. In the years after World War II, how did scientists justify further research and development of nuclear weapons? How did cultural images facilitate this process? 2. What prompted U.S. policymakers to launch the "peaceful atom" campaign?

3. How was civil defense used to encourage public acquiescence during the early years of the nuclear arms race?

4. Why were so many civil defense campaigns directed toward women and children?

5. Did CDA materials provide an accurate portrayal of nuclear war?

3. Some Caminalcules went extinct without leaving descendents. In the real world, what intrinsic factors (i.e., related to an organism’s basic reproductive biology, population biology, ecological niche, etc.) or extrinsic factors (e.g., ecological/environmental factors) might increase or decrease the probability of a species going extinct? PLEASE DO NOT REFER TO HUMAN-CAUSED EXTINCTIONS IN YOUR ANSWER.

4. Find two additional examples of convergent evolution among the modern-day Caminalcules. This means finding cases where two or more species have a similar characteristic that evolved

independently in each lineage. The wing of bats, birds and bees is an example of

convergence since the three groups did not inherit the characteristic from their common

ancestor. Write your answers in complete sentences (e.g.,“Species x and y both have ____

but their most recent common ancestor, z, did not”). List two additional real-world examples

of convergent evolution (ones that we have not already talked about in class) and discuss

what might have caused the convergence.

5. a. Describe two examples of vestigial structures that you can find among the

Caminalcules. These are structures that have been reduced to the point that they are

virtually useless. Ear muscles and the tailbones are examples of vestigial structures in our

own species.

b. Explain how vestigial structures provide clues about a species’ evolutionary past.

Illustrate your argument with vestigial structures found in humans or other real species.

Kindly answer question 3 to 5 thank you.

For years we have been able to analyze the fossils of extincthumans like those of Neanderthals. Their bones gave us clues to howthey looked, how they lived, and how they might be related to us.In the last few years, we have been able to get a better view intothese extinct species and their relationship to our species. Thanksto next generation genomic sequencing technologies, we have beenable to obtain genetic data on Neanderthals, Denisovans and othersthat have allowed us to make direct comparisons between our speciesand theirs. In addition, we have been able to observe the presenceof DNA from these extinct species within our own genomes which tellus that we had kids with these now extinct humans.

If we take Neanderthal DNA as an example, we find that we share99.5 percent of our DNA with them. Which means that we andNeanderthals were separated from each other for more than 500,000years. This also means that we were genetically similar enough tobe able to have offspring with each other. We see evidence of thisgenetic introgression between us and Neanderthals when we look atour DNA. Interestingly, if we obtain one thousand DNA samples fromGrossmont College students, we estimate that we would be able toextract at least 20% of the Neanderthal genome from them. Thismeans that 20% of our collective nucleotide sequences are sharedwith Neanderthals but this doesn’t mean that 20% of our genes areNeanderthal specific genes. Of the twenty-one thousand genes thatNeanderthals had, only a few dozen of their genes survive withinour genome. The same holds true for Denisovans. What is moreinteresting is that older versions of ourselves have a tendency tohave higher levels of DNA from extinct humans compared toourselves. In other words, over the course of thousands of years wehave been slowly weeding out the DNA of the other humans from ourgenome in favor of our genes.

One basic question that we might like to ask is why have we beenlosing Neanderthal and Denisovan genes over time? Also, why do westill have a significant amount of DNA segments that don’t seem tobe going anywhere? The answer to this has to do with selection.

The answer to the first part of the question has to do with thefact that we were not fully genetically compatible with the otherhuman species to begin with. Basically, to have had Neanderthal orDenisovan genes in the past meant that an individual's level offitness was reduced. To get rid of their genes in favor of our ownwould mean that the relative fitness of individuals would increaseovertime.

The answer to the second question has to do with the fact thatDNA segments from Neanderthals and Denisovans that did not code forproteins remained because there was little selective pressureagainst them. As far as genes are concerned, the only Neanderthaland Denisovan genes that remain only exist because they had aselective advantage or at least have been neutral to ourspecies.

DNA segments that that were neutral or that had a selectiveadvantage, whether genes or not, simply remained because they wereadvantages or there was little selective pressure against them.

Your task for this week is to look for information about oneNeanderthal or Denisovan gene that survive within our species andto tell me what function that gene has and how that gene mayincrease the fitness of modern human populations.

  • In your post, discussONE Neanderthal orDenisovan gene that is currently found within our species.
    • Tell us about the gene and its function. Explain what it doesfor us. (Make sure you give a citation.)
    • Explain in your own words any possible advantages that yourNeanderthal or Denisovan gene might have. Make sure you give ininformed opinion that is grounded in your research.

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Biology 460,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in