HUMA 1825 Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Crown Attorney, Ancient Law, Montesquieu
1 Nov 2015
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Huma 1825 term 1 review: cohen; Jury would judge based on how the felt and what they heard. Writers would be very careful of how the audience would value and look upon them in that situation. Disputes spilled over into multiple contexts and does not resolve or settle anything. Enmity & rivalry; endless feuding that resulted to other cases (one persons gain is another persons loss, what hurts my enemies helps me too) Every person regardless of privilege has inheritance of value. Illustrates the irresolvable problems and how a dispute without a resolution plays out (a tragedy) Antigone and creon have their own laws that clash each other. There was never at any time a common law shared amongst everyone in the same value and promotion. The communication is restricted to very specific terms. Virtue; the excellence of the ability of being able to form your character well.
