From this interview example add more data, ask more questions so you can get a better understanding of the couples motivations and thoughts surround the other. Try and write the resposnes exactly as they are said, and not draw conclusions based on the first few responses. Also, try to find out more anecdotal information- religion? education level. Add more information to write a well developed case study.
Interview Questions: 1. How did you two meet?
2. What were your thoughts and feelings when you first met each other?
3. How did you know you were interested in the other person?
4. What qualities first attracted you to each other?
5. Did you have a specific idea of what you were looking for in a partner?
6. How long did it take for you to decide to commit to a long term relationship?
7. What challenges have you faced in your relationship, and how did you overcome them?
8. Were you able to smoothly integrate into one another’s family?
Anecdotal Notes:
Participants: M and N
Age: Both in their mid-20s
Gender: Male and female
Race/ethnicity: East African (Ethiopia) / East African ( Tanzania)
Responses:
1. N and M met through mutual friends at a party. ( “Me and M met through like mutual
friends at a party.”)
2. N thought M was pretty, while M found N to be smart and funny. (“ I thought M was very pretty to me for some reason, and I found N smart and funny.”)
3. They both felt an immediate connection and started talking for hours at the party. (“ We both kept on looking at each other and I don’t know we both felt this connection and after we started talking for a very long time.”)
4. N was attracted to M’s sense of humor and intelligence, while M was attracted to N’s confidence and good looks.
5. Both N and M had a general idea of what they wanted in a partner, but they were open to meeting someone who didn’t fit in all of their criteria.
6. It took them about 6 months to decide to commit to a long-term relationship.
7. They faced some challenges early on in their relationship, such as learning how to communicate effectively
8. They said “we were able to integrate into each other’s families fairly smoothly,although there were some cultural differences that we had to navigate. Overall, our families have been very supportive of our relationship.
Case Study:
N and M’s relationship can be explained by several theories. One theory is the principle of homogamy, which suggests that people are attracted to those who share similar characteristics. N and M both come from similar backgrounds and share similar interests and values, which may have contributed to their initial attraction. Another theory is social exchange theory, which suggests that people choose partners who offer them the greatest rewards and fewest costs. N and M may have seen each other as valuable and desirable partners who could offer them emotional support, companionship, and other benefits that outweigh any challenges of being in a relationship.
From this interview example add more data, ask more questions so you can get a better understanding of the couples motivations and thoughts surround the other. Try and write the resposnes exactly as they are said, and not draw conclusions based on the first few responses. Also, try to find out more anecdotal information- religion? education level. Add more information to write a well developed case study.
Interview Questions: 1. How did you two meet?
2. What were your thoughts and feelings when you first met each other?
3. How did you know you were interested in the other person?
4. What qualities first attracted you to each other?
5. Did you have a specific idea of what you were looking for in a partner?
6. How long did it take for you to decide to commit to a long term relationship?
7. What challenges have you faced in your relationship, and how did you overcome them?
8. Were you able to smoothly integrate into one another’s family?
Anecdotal Notes:
Participants: M and N
Age: Both in their mid-20s
Gender: Male and female
Race/ethnicity: East African (Ethiopia) / East African ( Tanzania)
Responses:
1. N and M met through mutual friends at a party. ( “Me and M met through like mutual
friends at a party.”)
2. N thought M was pretty, while M found N to be smart and funny. (“ I thought M was very pretty to me for some reason, and I found N smart and funny.”)
3. They both felt an immediate connection and started talking for hours at the party. (“ We both kept on looking at each other and I don’t know we both felt this connection and after we started talking for a very long time.”)
4. N was attracted to M’s sense of humor and intelligence, while M was attracted to N’s confidence and good looks.
5. Both N and M had a general idea of what they wanted in a partner, but they were open to meeting someone who didn’t fit in all of their criteria.
6. It took them about 6 months to decide to commit to a long-term relationship.
7. They faced some challenges early on in their relationship, such as learning how to communicate effectively
8. They said “we were able to integrate into each other’s families fairly smoothly,although there were some cultural differences that we had to navigate. Overall, our families have been very supportive of our relationship.
Case Study:
N and M’s relationship can be explained by several theories. One theory is the principle of homogamy, which suggests that people are attracted to those who share similar characteristics. N and M both come from similar backgrounds and share similar interests and values, which may have contributed to their initial attraction. Another theory is social exchange theory, which suggests that people choose partners who offer them the greatest rewards and fewest costs. N and M may have seen each other as valuable and desirable partners who could offer them emotional support, companionship, and other benefits that outweigh any challenges of being in a relationship.
