I am doing a class discussion that I will be getting marks out of. Please answer the questions below THROUGHLY with real life proof so that i can get the full marks.
Supreme court of Canada, strikes down life without parole ruling. In Canada’s legal justice system, sentencing is the process of determining the appropriate punishment for a person who has been found guilty of a criminal offense. Sentencing is a critical part of the criminal justice system as aims to balance, the interest of the offender, the victim and society as a whole.
1. What do you think about the Supreme Court’s ruling on striking down life parole sentences? Do you believe this will have a positive or negative impact on the Canadian justice system? why or why not
2. In what ways do you think this ruling will affect the victims of violent crimes and their families? Will this ruling bring them justice or will it further traumatize them?
3. The Supreme Court’s decision was based on the notion that life sentences with no possibility of parole are “ cruel and unusual punishment”. Do you agree or disagree with this assertion? Why or why not?
4. What alternatives to life parole sentences do you think that Canadian justice system can implement to ensure public safety and rehabilitation of offenders?
5. In your opinion, how will this ruling change the way in which Canadian courts sentence individuals convicted of violent crimes? Do you think that other countries should adopt a similar approach? Why or why not?
6. How do you think this ruling will affect the public’s perception of the Canadian justice system? Will it increase or decrease public confidence in the system? why?
The picture that I have attached are some videos in articles you can refer to to answer the questions to provide proof to back up your answers. Please make sure you answer them thoroughly. And make it sound like you have a great understanding of the topic and provide proof to support so i can get the full marks
I am doing a class discussion that I will be getting marks out of. Please answer the questions below THROUGHLY with real life proof so that i can get the full marks.
Supreme court of Canada, strikes down life without parole ruling. In Canada’s legal justice system, sentencing is the process of determining the appropriate punishment for a person who has been found guilty of a criminal offense. Sentencing is a critical part of the criminal justice system as aims to balance, the interest of the offender, the victim and society as a whole.
1. What do you think about the Supreme Court’s ruling on striking down life parole sentences? Do you believe this will have a positive or negative impact on the Canadian justice system? why or why not
2. In what ways do you think this ruling will affect the victims of violent crimes and their families? Will this ruling bring them justice or will it further traumatize them?
3. The Supreme Court’s decision was based on the notion that life sentences with no possibility of parole are “ cruel and unusual punishment”. Do you agree or disagree with this assertion? Why or why not?
4. What alternatives to life parole sentences do you think that Canadian justice system can implement to ensure public safety and rehabilitation of offenders?
5. In your opinion, how will this ruling change the way in which Canadian courts sentence individuals convicted of violent crimes? Do you think that other countries should adopt a similar approach? Why or why not?
6. How do you think this ruling will affect the public’s perception of the Canadian justice system? Will it increase or decrease public confidence in the system? why?
The picture that I have attached are some videos in articles you can refer to to answer the questions to provide proof to back up your answers. Please make sure you answer them thoroughly. And make it sound like you have a great understanding of the topic and provide proof to support so i can get the full marks
