m.mazumder12

m.mazumder12

Lv1

m.mazumder12

0 Followers
0 Following
0 Helped

ANSWERS

Published11

Subjects

English3Algebra2Computer Science3Statistics2Chemistry1
Answer: you need to be more specificStep-by-step explanation:let me know where...
Answer: Let u and v be any two vectors in Rm. Then the cosine of the angle bet...

Two arguments offer the bare beginnings of an answer to this complicated question. The first is that the desire to exploit labor was a central feature of most colonizing societies in the Americas, especially those that relied on the exportation of valuable commodities like sugar, tobacco, rice and (much later) cotton. Cheap labor in large quantities was the critical factor that made these commodities profitable, and planters did not care who provided it - the indigenous population, white indentured servants and eventually African slaves - so long as they were there to be exploited.

To say that this system of exploitation was morally corrupt requires one to identify when moral arguments against slavery began to appear. One also has to recognize that there were two sources of moral opposition to slavery, and they only emerged after 1750. One came from radical Protestant sects like the Quakers and Baptists, who came to perceive that the exploitation of slaves was inherently sinful. The other came from the revolutionaries who recognized, as Jefferson argued in his Notes on the State of Virginia, that the very act of owning slaves would implant an "unremitting despotism" that would destroy the capacity of slaveowners to act as republican citizens. The moral corruption that Jefferson worried about, in other words, was what would happen to slaveowners who would become victims of their own

"boisterous passions.

. "

But the great problem that Jefferson faced - and which many of his modern critics ignore - is that he could not imagine how black and white peoples could ever coexist as free citizens in one republic. There was, he argued in Query XIV of his Notes, already too much foul history dividing these peoples.

And worse still, Jefferson hypothesized, in proto-racist terms, that the differences between the peoples would also doom this relationship. He thought that African Americans should be freed - but colonized elsewhere.

This is the aspect of Jefferson's thinking that we find so distressing and depressing, for obvious reasons. Yet we also have to recognize that he was trying to grapple, I think sincerely, with a real problem.

No historical account of the origins of American slavery would ever satisfy our moral conscience today, but as I have repeatedly tried to explain to my Stanford students, the task of thinking historically is not about making moral judgments about people in the past. That's not hard work if you want to do it, but your condemnation, however justified, will never explain why people in the past acted as they did. That's our real challenge as historians.

Do you believe the founders of the United States are still relevant to our modern times? Why or why not? Use evidence from the text and materials from the unit to support your claim

Answer: The founders of the United States, such as Thomas Jefferson, are still...
Answer: The issue of slavery was a complicated one for the founding fathers, a...
Answer:One example of a piece of media that celebrates a type of beauty outsid...
Answer:To calculate the force constants for these molecules, we can use the fo...
Answer:One example of a media that challenges processes of Othering is the nov...
Answer: Project Highlights and main topic with reference are given in the word...
Answer: The Preamble to the United States Constitution sets forth the goals an...
Answer: When someone says "I decline to testify on the basis of my Fifth Amend...
Answer: The three branches of the American government are the executive, legis...

Weekly leaderboard

Start filling in the gaps now
Log in