It was not possible to use a stellar parallax for ancient people. Why?

answer

watching

views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

You have 0 free answers left.
Get unlimited access to 3.8 million step-by-step answers.

Get unlimited access

Already have an account? Log in

Casey DurganLv2

26 Jul 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.

Already have an account? Log in

Related questions

It was not possible to use a stellar parallax for ancient people. Why?

Theoretical question here on relativity and lengthcontraction:

If a neutron star of upper-limit mass is moving at a highlyrelativistic speed when viewed by an observer, then we know thatthe neutron star will appear to contract in the direction ofmotion.

Is it possible for the neutron star to appear to contractsufficiently enough so that its density becomes large enough to beconsidered a black hole (satisfies Schwarzschild radius) relativeto a stationary observer?

That is to say, is it possible for a stellar object to be a neutronstar in its rest frame but a black hole in the another frame ofreference? If so, what implications could that hold, would light beunable to escape it from the observer's frame (but possible toescape it from its rest frame)?

It is said that in ancient times a rich man with a bag of gold coins was stranded on the surface of a frozen lake. Because the ice was frictionless, he could not push himself to shore and froze to death. what could he have done to save himself had he not been so miserly?