PHIL 2501 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Thermostat, False Dilemma, Chauvinism

16 views7 pages
1 Mar 2022
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Just because it"s coded doesn"t mean it isn"t legitimate. Plenty of our beliefs and preferences were ingrained into us by external actors. Mind signals as to their condition and what they require. If we were to simply isolate the brain without the other parts of the body, I find it extremely hard to believe that the brain would be able to think in the same way we do now. There are a myriad of sensations/ideas that will be blinded to it: furthermore, implying that there is such a thing known as the mind that is divorced from other functions seems dubious at best. We are oftentimes at the behest of our unconscious biases/actions/thoughts so where is this. Why can"t human intentionality/action be ascribed the same formal symbol attribution that this machine is? (1) putnam"s choice of examples: putnam"s examples of mental states are pain, visual sensations, hunger, anger, etc. (what.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions