PHIL 2010 Lecture 19: 19

62 views1 pages

magentarat431

5 May 2018

School

University of Georgia

Department

Philosophy

Course

PHIL 2010

Professor

Athanasios Samaras

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

-The reason that they are in this position is, for historical reasons, they are in this

position but that is something that happened in history and because of that it can: the

relationship between men and women can change and the domination of men is not

something sanctified by natural law or divine law.

-Remember for Hegel, there is nothing such as the absolute truth; instead it is something

that is the result of a historical struggle and because of that it can change

-And what will change it? What will it take for slaves to change their position and not be

slaves anymore?

-Hegel says slaves know the world better because they work with material things. So the

slaves does manual labor has a better relationship with the world than the master does

not have.

-Hegel’s final point is that what makes the master a master is not that there is something

like an absolute truth out there.

-Divine or Natural or anything like that

-The divine always changes. The divine is where the spirit is. So there is none of that.

-What makes the master a master is the recognition of the slaves.

-The only thing that lets the master dominate the slaves is the fact that the slaves accept

the domination of the master. It is only because the women accept the position is that

they accept it.

-But in order to stop it, the first thing they need to do is withdraw their recognition from

their masters and the only way they can do that is when they understand that this is not

natural or divine. This is historical. So if they want to escape that, they can. And for

Hegel, it is really important that the way these struggles and resolved

-Geist is always going in the right direction in the direction of greatest freedom. So

women will be free once they are done with the struggle.

-When the spirit becomes absolute, Hegels idea is that all this is resolved. Everyone is

free as free as they can be.

-Mill

-Utilitarianism is the version/concept within consequentialism

-”To determine whether something is right or wrong, you cannot do it a priori”

-Where does ethical knowledge come from?

-Look at experience to tell if its right or wrong

-What is the goal?

-Happiness

-The right action is what produces the greatest amount of happiness for the most people.

-Utilitarianism assumes people can work out what makes other people happy

-Intelligence is also required to act morally. Even if you have the right intention, if the

outcome does not make people happy, it is not moral

-Mill makes the claim that if X is the only thing desired

-If i desire something, it ought to be denied

-Assumes you can’t possibly desire things bad for you

-Or whatever you desire is the right thing

-Mill speaks of virtue and defines happiness as a psychological phenomenon. Victorian

virtue was love of money, power, and fame.

-Happiness in terms of ruling class

-Utilitariansism produces common sense results

find more resources at oneclass.com

Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 1 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Remember for hegel, there is nothing such as the absolute truth; instead it is something that is the result of a historical struggle and because of that it can change. Hegel says slaves know the world better because they work with material things. So the slaves does manual labor has a better relationship with the world than the master does not have. Hegel"s final point is that what makes the master a master is not that there is something like an absolute truth out there. What makes the master a master is the recognition of the slaves. The only thing that lets the master dominate the slaves is the fact that the slaves accept the domination of the master. It is only because the women accept the position is that they accept it.

Related Questions

Brief and detail

If relativism is true, can you ever judge something as being morally wrong? Consider some really horrible actions, genocide, murder, slavery, torture or add your own. If you feel a relativist could say that these things are actually wrong, what gives them this ability? If they can't, why not?

Agree or disagree

Similarly to what I said in the first discussion on what morality means to us, I think everyone has their own set of moral principles and obligations. So I do think that relativism is true, to a point however. I used Adolf Hitler and the Nazi empire as an example in the first discussion so I will use that here. Hitler knew in his brain that what he was doing was good for his nation and arguably the world. Now, as a modern day society we can agree that was wrong. For him, it was good. In his own mind, he is right. But it is relative to the person. Generally speaking we all have similar notions of what is right and what is wrong. Most people would say that going out of your way to help someone else is a morally good principle. Selflessness in society is seen a good thing by the vast majority of people. When I say that relativism is good to a point, I mean that there is a general basis in society that deems actions as good or bad. And since most of us would all agree that hitlers actions were bad, then we say that he had bad moral principles, even though to him, they were good. It’s a little confusing even for me to put into words. Basically, if you actions are generally viewed in society as good, then you have good moral principles even if they vary from person to person. No one will have the exact same moral standards, but generally they all are very similar in society. So relativism is true until the point where the majority of society would deem your actions and wrong. I hope this makes sense.

Agree or disagree

If relativism is true, I don't think judging something as morally wrong is possible. Because the definition of ethical relativism is the moral standard only being correctly relative to each person/society, this means that the moral standard is created by you and/or the society you identify with and therefore eliminate the existence of an absolute moral principle. Since the moral standard is different for every individual, we cannot say that someone is morally wrong. If relativism is applied, that is. If a relativist were to say that they could judge someone as morally wrong, then that would contradict the main component of being a relativist. That every moral argument of yours is correct, therefore everyone else's is also correct. Quite problematic but that is my understanding on the matter

ell25

A mass m rests on a frictionless horizontal table and isconnected to rigid supports via 2 identical springs each of relaxedlength L0 and spring constantk. Each spring is stretched to a length L considerable greater thanL0. Horizontal displacementsof m from its equilibrium position are labeled x and y.

(Diagram insert didn't work, all it really tells you is that xis on the axis of the springs and y is perpendicular to thesprings)

a) Write down the differential equation of motion (i.e.,Newton's Law) governing small oscillations in the xdirection.

b) Same as a but in the y direction (assume that y <<L).

c) In terms of L and L0, calculate the ratio of the periods ofthe oscillations along x and y.

d) If at t=0 the mass m is released from the point x = y = A0with zero velocity, what are its x and y coordinates at any latertime t?

---------------------------

So, I started with just ma = -2kx for a, leading me to thedifferential equation x''(t) + (2k/m) x = 0.

Then I did basically the same thing with y.

However, when I get to c, there's my problem - I don't knowhow I could write any of this in L and L0.

Also, b doesn't really make sense to me because if y is smallwhen compared to L, it seems like there shouldn't be anyoscillation in the y direction.

The answer the back of the book shows for c and d are:

c) Tx/Ty = (1 - L0 / L)1/2

d) x(t) = A0cos( (2k/m)1/2 t)

y(t) = A0cos( (2k(L-L0)/mL)1/2 t)

I have no idea how they got to these answers. Can somebodyhelp me? It has something to do with springs already beingstretched, but it seems they are making an assumption somewherethat I don't understand.

A boy in a wheelchair (total mass 50.5 kg) has a speed of 1.40 m/s at the crest of a slope 2.40 m high and 12.4 m long. At the bottom of the slope, his speed is 6.50 m/s. Assume air resistance and rolling resistance can be modeled as a constant friction force of 41.0 N. Find the work he did in pushing forward on his wheels during the downhill ride.

2 Answers

Relevance

electron1
Lv 7

4 years ago

There are two forces that cause the wheelchair to accelerate. These two forces are the component of the wheelchair’s weight that is parallel to the hill and the force the boy exerts. The net force on the wheelchair is equal to the sum of these two forces minus the friction force. Let’s use the following equation to determine the acceleration.

vf2 = vi^2 + 2 * a * d

6.5^2 = 1.4^2 + 2 * a * 12.4

24.8 * a = 40.29

a = 40.29 ÷ 24.8

This is approximately 1.62 m/s^2.

Net force = 50.5 * 40.29 ÷ 24.8 = 2034.645 ÷ 24.8

This is approximately 82 N.

Force parallel = 50.5 * 9.8 * 2.40 ÷ 12.4 = 1187.76 ÷ 12.4

This is approximately 95.8 N. This force and the force that the boy exerts are the forces that cause the wheelchair to accelerate.

Net force = F + (1187.76 ÷ 12.4) – 41

Set the two net forces equal to each other.

F + (1187.76 ÷ 12.4) – 41 = 2034.645 ÷ 24.8

F = 41 + (2034.645 ÷ 24.8) – (1187.76 ÷ 12.4)

F is approximately 27.3 N

Work = [41 + (2034.645 ÷ 24.8) – (1187.76 ÷ 12.4)] * 12.4 = 337.9625 J
JupiterSky
Lv 6

4 years ago

His change in kinetic energy is due to gravitational- and his own work,

while the friction does negative work.

∆K = ∆U +∆W + ∆Wf

½m(Vf²−Vi²) = mgh + ∆W + Ff*d

∆W = ½m(Vf²−Vi²) − mgh − Ff*d

∆W = ½*50.5(6.5²−1.4²) − (50.5*9.8*2.4) − (−41*12.4)

∆W = 508 J

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.

Next Question

---

asked in Science & MathematicsPhysics · 8 years ago

What is the spring constant? please help me!!!!?

A block of mass 487 g is pushed against the
spring (located on the left-hand side of the
track) and compresses the spring a distance
4.7 cm from its equilibrium position (as shown
in the ﬁgure below). The block starts from
rest, is accelerated by the compressed spring,
and slides across a frictionless horizontal track
(as shown in the ﬁgure below). It leaves the
track horizontally, ﬂies through the air, and
subsequently strikes the ground.
acceleration = 9.81
 
A) What is the spring constant?
B)What is the speed v of the block when it leaves
the track?
C) What is the total speed of the block when it
hits the ground?
...Show more

Update:

Height Above ground = 1.9 m
Lands = 4.59m away

What is the spring constant? please help me!!!!?

3 Answers

Relevance

Jánošík
Lv 7

8 years ago

Favorite Answer

I'm sure there is some crucial information in "the figure below" !!!

Edit:

OK... now we got something to work with ... ;-)

Time needed to fall a vertical distance of 1.9 m is:

t = √( 2h / g )

t = √[ 2×(1.9 m) / (9.81 m/s²) ]

t = 0.6224 s

In that time, the block must travel a horizontal distance of 4.59 m, so the horizontal velocity is:

r = v×t

(4.59 m) = v×(0.6224 s)

v = 7.37 m/s < - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - answer B

That is also the speed of the block as it leaves the spring.

Its kinetic energy at that time is:

KE = m×v²/2

KE = (0.487 kg)×(7.3749 m/s)²/2

KE = 13.244 J

That is also the elastic potential energy stored in the spring at maximum compression. So the spring constant is:

KE = PEe = k×d²/2

(13.244 J) = k×(0.047 m)²/2

k = 12 N/m < - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - answer A

The gravitational potential energy of the block on the table is:

PEg = m×g×h

PEg = (0.487 kg)×(9.81 m/s²)×(1.9)

PEg = 9.077 J

The total energy of the block on the table is:

TE = PEg + PEe

TE = (9.077 J) + (13.244 J)

TE = 22.32 J

When hitting the ground, all that energy is converted to kinetic energy, so

TE = KE = m×v²/2

(22.32 J) = (0.487 kg)×v²/2

v = 9.57 m/s < - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - answer C

...Show more
Technobuff
Lv 7

8 years ago

There must be a height above ground and a distance from the end of the track on the "as shown in the figure below".??
STALKER
Lv 4

8 years ago

use f=kl

where k is the spring constant and l is extension from the natural length.

k=f/l

since you have mass in grams. use w=mg

w=0.487 x 9.8 = 4.77N

Now use the equation,

k=4.77/4.7

k=1.012

Note: my answer could be wrong since I do not know the springs original length from the diagram shown. But, the method of working out spring constant is same.

...Show more

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.

Next Question

ひいらぎ

Lv 5

asked in Science & MathematicsPhysics · 1 decade ago

Physics Momentum, Rolling?

Pat builds a track for his model car out of wood. The track is 10.00 cm wide and 3.00 m long, and is solid. The runway is cut such that it forms a parabola by the equation y=(x - 3)^2/9. Locate the horizontal position of the center of gravity of this track.
 
A washing machine load in the "spin" cycle, (much like a centrifuge used to separate fluids), can be modeled as a cylinder which has zero density toward the center, and starting from some inner radius where the clothes (or fluids) begin, increases in density as you move radially outward. The washing machine has density of clothes (in SI units) of p=14r+5, a height of 0.51 m, and only has clothes present from inner radius 0.2m out to 0.7m from the center.
-What is the moment of Inertia of the wash load?
-What is the power of motor that drives the clothes from rest up to 4 rev/sec, in 14 seconds if the basin has moment of Inertia of 4 kg*.m2
...Show more

Physics Momentum, Rolling?

1 Answer

Relevance

Anonymous

1 decade ago

Favorite Answer

I can't visualize the first problem.

The second: Moment of inertia is I = m r^2. In a shell of thickness dr there is a mass of p * 2 * pi * r * h * dr. The moment of inertia of the shell is 2 pi h p r^3 dr. Now integrate this from r = 0.2m to r = 0.7m.

Kinetic energy is 1/2 m v^2. In rotations the moment of inertia is like the mass and the angular velocity is like the velocity, so rotational energy is 1/2 I omega^2. Omega is in rad/s. The total inertia of the system is the sum of the inertia of the clothes and the basin. Divide the energy by the time needed to get the power.

...Show more

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.

Next Question

asked in Science & MathematicsPhysics · 1 decade ago

Physics:You and your friends push a 75-kg...Help!?

You and your friends push a 75-kg greased pig up an aluminum slide at the county fair, starting from the low end of the slide. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the pig and the slide is 0.070.
 
(a) All of you pushing together (parallel to the incline) manage to accelerate the pig from rest at the constant rate of 4.9 m/s2 over a distance of 1.8 m, at which point you release the pig. The pig continues up the slide, reaching a maximum vertical height above its release point of 50 cm. What is the angle of inclination of the slide? __degree
 
(b) At the maximum height the pig turns around and begins to slip down the slide, how fast is it moving when it arrives at the low end of the slide? __m/s
...Show more

Physics:You and your friends push a 75-kg...Help!?

1 Answer

Relevance

Anonymous

1 decade ago

Favorite Answer

♣the distance the pig was pushed up is

s=0.5*a*t^2, where s=1.8m, a=4.9m/s^2, t is time of push-up;

speed of the pig gained after s=1.8m is v=a*t; thus v^2=2as;

♠ kinetic energy of the pig at the moment it’s released after push-up is

E=0.5*m*v^2, which is enough for the pig to move by itself L distance more along the ramp, where L=h/sin(b), h=50cm=0.5m, b is angle in question;

♦pig’s potential energy at vertex (when stopped) is E1=mgh;

the energy E2=E-E1 is gone on friction, that is E2=f*L is work of friction, where

f=μ*w1, w1=mg*cos(b) is component of pig’s weight normal to the aluminum ramp; or;

f= μ*mg*cos(b);

♦Thus E2=E-E1; or; f*L = 0.5*m*v^2 –mgh; or;

(μ*mg*cos(b)) * (h/sin(b)) =0.5*m* 2as –mgh; or;

μ*gh*cos(b)/sin(b) =as –gh, hence cot(b) =(as –gh)/(μ*gh), hence

(a); b=atan(μ*gh/(as-gh))= atan(0.07*9.8*0.5/(4.9*1.8 -9.8*0.5)) =5°;

♥ pig’s potential energy above the low end of the ramp is

W= mg*(s*sin(b) +h); pig’s ramp position is p=s +L = s + h/sin(b);

Pig’s final kinetic energy is W1=W-W2, where W2=f*p is work of friction;

and W1=0.5*m*v^2; thus

0.5*m*v^2 = mg*(s*sin(b) +h) – μ*mg*cos(b)*(s + h/sin(b));

v^2 =2g*(s*sin(b) +h)*(1 –μ*cot(b)) =2.575;

(b); v =1.605 m/s;

...Show more

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.

+100

Join Yahoo Answers and get 100 points today.

PHIL 2010 Lecture 19: 19

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

PHIL 2010 Lecture Notes - Lecture 18: Baruch Spinoza

PHIL 2010 Lecture Notes - Lecture 17: Antithesis, Dialectic, Determinism

PHIL 2010 Lecture Notes - Lecture 16: Categorical Imperative, Baruch Spinoza, Monism

Related Questions

2 Answers

What is the spring constant? please help me!!!!?

3 Answers

Physics Momentum, Rolling?

1 Answer

Physics:You and your friends push a 75-kg...Help!?

1 Answer

Trending Questions