BIO 358 Lecture Notes - Lecture 6: Kin Selection, Proximate And Ultimate Causation, Social Revolution

36 views5 pages
Topic 6: Kin selected behavior in humans
Key Terms:
1. Genetic relatedness VERSUS Genetic identity
2. Ultimate causation VERSUS Proximate causation
3. Psychological devices or mechanisms
4. Reproductive value
5. Kin selection
6. Conspecifics
7. Conflict of interest
KEY CONCEPT QUESTION: Having established how non-human animals evolve to behave socially toward other
conspecifics, we next need to understand how humans resemble (or not) the social behavior of non-human
animals. Given our understanding of how natural selection shapes genetic design information to control non-
human animal social behavior, we can now ask how and if this picture applies to human social behavior
(Chapter 4 in Death from a Distance; TOPIC 6 lecture video). Which of the following is the most accurate and
complete picture of what this comparison taught us?
a. Humans behave toward non-kin very much as non-human animals do, but are very often much less
cooperative toward close kin than non-human animals are.
b. Humans behave toward close kin very much as non-human animals do, but are very often much more
cooperative toward non-kin than non-human animals are.
c. Human social behavior is so completely controlled by culturally transmitted information that the theory of
genetic evolution of social behavior in non-humans is not at all applicable to us.
d. Human social behavior is remarkably similar to non-human animal social behavior in essentially every way
that we can quantitatively compare.
Notes:
1) Kin-selected behaviors in humans
a) Strong, NEW selection can produce evolutionary revolution
i) Social revolution
(1) Drives the genetic redesign
(2) Was NOT genetic change that drove our divergence from chimps, it was our SELECTION that
drove the genetic redesign
(a) This new selection was a social revolution
b) Kin selected cooperation and kin selected competition
2) Thinking like a geneMetaphor
a) Genes build animals that have minds that behave as if the gene were thinking
b) Animals we discussed
i) Cooperation between bee-eater birds
ii) Competition in the case of lion infanticide
iii) Where did these behaviors come from? (non-human behavior)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 5 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
(1) Mindspurposeful ehaior……..BUT
(a) Design information shaped by natural selection builds these minds
(b) Minds are the agent of behavior but not its cause
(i) Proximate or immediate cause
1. What our mind is doing
(c) The source is the design info
(i) Ultimate cause: design info built by natural selection
1. Another source of ultimate causation of human behavior is cultural information
3) Some of the most basic and universal features of human breeding behavior are kin-selected
a) Humans obey hamiltons law, but not only this
i) The iolate hailto’s la i the puli sphere
b) Vast majority of human infants are raised by their mothers. Why?
i) If an infant pops outta yo body, you know 100% that at least 50% of the ifat’s geeti ifo is
yours
(1) if ou’re a father, ou do’t hae this sae ofidee
(a) most cases you have no way of knowing the female mates w another male
c) Kin selection theory predicts about mammalian parentage: children should be a lot closer to their
mothers than to their father
i) Humans behave this way
ii) This is great evidence of humans being like non-humans
iii) Humans are often raised by very close kin, and the closer to the certainty of kinship, the more likely
that individual is involved in rearing human offspring
(1) Exactly the non-human pattern
4) Humans and the conflict of interest problem
a) Predict that the social revolution in the human lineage has to do w the unique control of the COI
problem
b) Non-human animals engage in kin-selected competitive behavior and kin-selected cooperative
behavior
i) Humans retain the cooperative behaviors but suppress and manage the competitive behaviors
c) The uniquely human ethical sense
i) Proximate
d) Private lives, public lives
5) Mating behavior and anatomy illustrate the power of cooperation when conflicts of interest do not
interfere
a) Potential for cooperation of non-kin conspecifics if the COI does not get in the way
b) Humans are the first animals where COI does not get in the way of the public domain
6) Homicide statistics, a powerful test of kin-selection theory in humansreproductive value and infanticide
a) A powerful source of evidence to test theories of human social behavior Homicide by Daly & Wilson
i) Occasionally, humans will kill their kids
(1) Involves stressful situations where dispensing the offspring allows the adult to survive and
reproduce at a more favorable set of circumstances
(2) Reproductive value..
(a) New born baby is only have as valuable as an older adult b/c the older adult is more likely to
reproduce successfully
(b) In homicide statistics of a natural parent, there is a very sharp peak at young age, showing
eatl as e’d epet—most homicide occur during a very young age of the child
(i) This shows that we act qualitatively similar to non-humans, however quantitatively the
number of humans committing this homicide is very low compared to non-humans
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 5 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related textbook solutions

Related Documents

Related Questions