LAW 122 Lecture 9: Ethical Reasoning

• School: Ryerson University
• Department: Law and Business
• Course: LAW 122
• Professor: Patricia Hania

Document Summary

Ca(cid:374) (cid:455)ou gi(cid:448)e (cid:862)i told the truth a(cid:271)out (cid:271)reaki(cid:374)g the la(cid:373)p, (cid:271)e(cid:272)ause that (cid:449)as the right thi(cid:374)g to do(cid:863) (cid:862)it is good to help a frie(cid:374)d i(cid:374) (cid:374)eed(cid:863) (cid:862)dis(cid:272)ri(cid:373)i(cid:374)atio(cid:374) (cid:271)ased o(cid:374) ra(cid:272)e, ge(cid:374)der, or se(cid:454)ual orie(cid:374)tatio(cid:374) is u(cid:374)ethi(cid:272)al(cid:863) Ethical statements ethical values and principles can conflict. 4 kinds of ethical reasons concerned in the long run fairly. We should pay our debts and treat like cases alike (promises/commitements) example we want to set. Ethical reasoning process: steps you can follow to help with an ethical dilemma. Value: something good that we ought to promote. Principle: a rule, usually grounded in a value, that tells you what you should do. You should do what you can to fight injustice. You should stand up for what you believe in. But both are sources of guidance, basis for decision. Ethics: informal, unwritten and must be reasoned about by regular people. Law: written rules enforced and interpreted by police and judges.