LAW 201 Study Guide - Quiz Guide: Larceny, Jaguar, Voir Dire
7 Feb 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Events: the appellant had been convicted of defrauding the complainant above and theft through his renovation business, stay in place renovations . Claims: the appellant claims that he did not commit these crimes and that through trial judge err and misinterpretation of facts that he was wrongly convicted. Procedural history: this is an appeal decision in the court of appeal for ontario by k. m. weiler. J. a, m. tulloch j. a, and k. van rensburg j. a. Mrs. heath was a 76 year old woman which suffered from a mental illness and was restricted by her financial advisor to withdrawing each month. Mrs. heath and the appellant signed a contract to begin renovation at her home amounting to 617. 50 on august 13th, 2008. August 15th, she had signed a contract amounting to 010 for further renovation. September 12th, she had signed her third contract which was the price of 300.
