BTF1010 Study Guide - Final Guide: Eye Surgery, No Liability, Contributory Negligence

• School: Monash University
• Department: Business - BTF
• Course: BTF1010
• Professor: Professor

Document Summary

Tort is (cid:449)he(cid:374) o(cid:374)e perso(cid:374)(cid:859)s (cid:449)ro(cid:374)gful (cid:272)o(cid:374)du(cid:272)t i(cid:374)fri(cid:374)ges a(cid:374)other perso(cid:374)(cid:859)s rights and loss, or damage is caused. Establishing a duty of care: the (cid:862)reaso(cid:374)able foreseeability of har(cid:373) test(cid:863) Can it be foreseen that the act or omission would likely cause harm: consider whether p belonged to the class of people that d should have regarded as bei(cid:374)g (cid:858)at risk(cid:859) of bei(cid:374)g i(cid:374)jured or sufferi(cid:374)g loss. If injury is not foreseeable and there is no neighbour test, liability is too broad: duty of care and acts causing physical harm. Australian safety stores v zaluzna: duty of care and acts causing mental harm. Tame v nsw (not foreseeable: duty of care and liability for omissions. Roger v whitaker (failure to warn) eye surgery. Nagle v rottnest (failure to warn) failure of duty to care as occupier of. Cal v mab (no duty of care required: negligent acts causing pure economic loss.