I AM DOING A MOCK TRIAL CASE TOMORROW ON THE RV HUDSON CASE. I am playing the role of Dr. J. Tyrone as a defence expert witness Doctor. The picture that I have provided above is my script for tomorrow however, if there is any additional information that you could ask for me, that would be great.

Any additional information that would prove our case is right and that we will win. You can add on some university to the script that would make me sound even more professional, and believable and scientifically proven stuff that Michael Hudson was genuinely sleepwalking so my team (the defence team) Can win

Please make sure this information is that a great 12 university level and please answer this fast. I need it as soon as possible.

Hi. I am doing a mock trial in law and i am on the defence team. I am playing the a expert doctors role (Defence witness: Dr. J. Tyrone). The picture below is my script.

The case is the automatism case on Michael Hudson.

https://lawlessons.ca/sites/default/files/2022-06/RvHudson.pdf

This link above is the case you can read and understand what happened

Can you please provide me with stuff i can add to my script. By any stuff i mean scientific proven stuff to defend Michael Hudson. I need smart scientific stuff to make my team win please help me I need it to be so good i need my team to win

Please provide me with smart scientific things to backup my point and script and to prove the prosecution wrong and to get 100%

I am doing a mock trial in class based on the rv hudson case. It’s the link below

I am playing the role of the expert witness (Defence Witness #4-Dr. J. Tyrone). Press the link above and read his script.

Can you please list his (the expert, Dr.) strengths and weaknesses

I am doing a assignment for a law class where I have to write. Cross examination questions. The questions are based on the R.v Hudson case automatism. (the case about Michael Hudson, who drove 27 km to his in-laws home and he killed his mother-in-law and seriously injured his father-in-law but then he claims that he was sleepwalking.) you can read more about this case on Google and then do this for me.

So I am cross examining constable kramer which is on the defence team.

Cross examination consist in interrogating the opposite parties witness who has already testified (for example, direct examination) it may be followed by a re-direct examination. The scope of cross examination is checking, or discrediting the witnesses testimony, knowledge or credibility. And preparing your cross examination, you should focus on the fact that will help prove your case. Your questions on Cross should be leading giving the witness very little to no opportunity to explain his/her/their views.

task:

1. choose one witness from the other side. (we are doing constable kramer)

2. Compose cross examination questions for that witness make sure that your questions are open and type questions.

3. Minimum 10 questions for that witness

THE PICTURES BELOW IS AN EXAMPLE OF A CROSS EXAMINATION TO HELP YOU: