PHIL 2429 Chapter Notes - Chapter 6: Jus Ad Bellum, J. Walter Thompson, The Civilians

• School: University of Iowa
• Department: Philosophy
• Course: PHIL 2429
• Professor: Davidovic Jovana

Document Summary

Most jwt endorse the moral equality of combatants combatants do no wrong in fighting wars even if they fight on the unjust ide. Orthodox jwt says that combatants need concern themselves only with how they fight, not with why they fight. P(cid:396)o(cid:448)ided the(cid:455) do(cid:374)"t (cid:271)(cid:396)ea(cid:272)h (cid:396)ules of jus i(cid:374) (cid:271)ello the(cid:374) the(cid:455) do (cid:374)othi(cid:374)g (cid:449)(cid:396)o(cid:374)g e(cid:448)e(cid:374) if thei(cid:396) war is unjust. War is a political struggle between states, not between individual combatants. Gladiatorial model of combat: combatants are forced to fight by their states: e(cid:448)e(cid:396)(cid:455)o(cid:374)e"s best interests to fight si(cid:374)(cid:272)e the(cid:455) (cid:449)ill othe(cid:396)(cid:449)ise suffe(cid:396) states" (cid:449)(cid:396)ath then they do no wrong by fighting. Boxing model of combat: combatants agree to kill and be killed; fighti(cid:374)g f(cid:396)eel(cid:455)". Either the combatants have no choice but to fight in which case the(cid:455)"(cid:396)e all morally innocent or they mutually consent to fight which absolves each other of wrongdoing and makes them all morally innocent.