PHI 2010 Chapter Notes - Chapter 0: Immanuel Kant, Universalizability, Universal Law

200 views1 pages
School
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Most of the time, whether or not we ought to do something isn"t really a moral choice instead, it"s just contingent on our desires. Ex: if your desire is to get an a in class, then you ought to study. They are commands that you should follow if you want something. Commands you must follow, regardless of your desires. It doesn"t matter whether you want to be moral or not the moral law is binding on all of us. Kant argued that there are four formulations of the categorical imperative. Stealing isn"t universalizable: you can"t make exceptions for yourself. We are not mere objects that exist to be used by others. We have the ability to set our own goals, and work toward them. This imbues us with an absolute moral worth, which means that we shouldn"t be manipulated, or manipulate other autonomous agents for our own benefit. : lying and deception is never okay.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related textbook solutions

Related Documents