BUS 102 Chapter Notes - Chapter Justice: Milo Yiannopoulos, Tomi Lahren, Margaret Atwood
Document Summary
In the second half of the book, justice by michael j. sandel, the author argues that we as a society cannot come to a consensus on justice without using moral and religious arguments in the discussion. Sandel (2009) makes this claim based on the assumption that humans have obligations of solidarity and loyalty, historic memory and religious faith. Moral claims that arise from the communities and traditions that shape our identity (p. 220). In essence, he argues that freedom of choice is not the only basis we can use to evaluate important questions that we as a society face. He argues against the popular logic of neutrality in politics and presents his arguments with supporting logic from. While reading the text, i was often struck with moments of disagreement with sandel"s approval of using moral and religious arguments in politics and law.
