GOV 120 Chapter Notes - Chapter 1: Civil Rights Act Of 1964, Huey P. Newton, Voting Rights Act Of 1965

35 views2 pages
28 Aug 2020
School
Department
Course
Professor
Jack Warner
Government 120 - American Government
Textbook
Fall 2017
GE
Plessy v. Ferguson
De jure v. De facto segregation Major Supreme Court Action on Race
Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)
Sweatt vs. Painter (1950)
Brown vs. Board of Education I (1954) and II (1955)
Irene Morgan v. Commonwealth of Virginia (1946) and Boynton v. .Virginia (1960) The
Movement
Supreme Court decisions spring boarded a greater movement in the 1960s
began with bus boycotts in the late 50s
sit ins
Martin Luther King Jr
Marches- especially on Washington and Montgomery
NAACP and SNCC
Freedom Riders
Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam
Huey Newton
Black Panthers The Legislation
Civil Rights Act 1964
Voting Rights Act 1965
Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
Laws that treat people differently
suspect classications
strict scrutiny
test used when laws treat people differently because of race
Quasi-suspect classications
intermediate standard of review
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

De jure v. de facto segregation major supreme court action on race: missouri ex rel. Gaines v. canada (1938: sweatt vs. painter (1950, brown vs. board of education i (1954) and ii (1955) Irene morgan v. commonwealth of virginia (1946) and boynton v. virginia (1960) the. Black panthers the legislation: civil rights act 1964, voting rights act 1965, shelby county v. holder (2013) Laws that treat people differently: suspect classi cations, strict scrutiny, test used when laws treat people differently because of race, quasi-suspect classi cations, intermediate standard of review. Nonsuspect classi cations minimum rationality test: used when laws treat people differently for any other reason (age, sexual orientation, disability status) Af rmative action: regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978, grutter v. bollinger (2003, af rmative action- policy and procedures that seek to remedy disadvantages experience by other groups.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents