SPEA-J - Public And Environmental Affairs SPEA-J 302 Chapter Notes - Chapter 5: Plain View Doctrine, Exigent Circumstance, Hot Pursuit

78 views6 pages

Document Summary

Exceptions to the warrant requirements 4 broad types. Allows officers to search a suspect following their arrest. Chimel v. california the ussc held that the full search of a house was unreasonable, but it is okay to search the arrestee for weapons and evidence. Searches based on the plain view doctrine: searches incident to arrest. Officers must consider the nature or seriousness of the offense. Us v. robinson court held that a pat-down of a suspect"s out clothing is permissible following an arrest for driving with a revoked license. Thus any arrest justifies a warrantless search incident to that arrest. The arrest must result in a person being taken into custody. Knowles v. iowa the cops stopped a guy for speeding and gave him a citation, then searched his car & found marijuana. The court held that to do an incident to arrest search, the suspect must be arrested. Pc must precede the warrantless search sibron v. new york.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents