ECON 463 Chapter 1-1: ECONOMICS3

131 views1 pages
15 Jun 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
osh, excellent. Made me think. This was great.
I particularly liked your comment: "But inasmuch as I think he is an incorrect
economist is that simply because he comes to a different conclusion than I do?
Yes, of course. I believe that my views are correct and if his views conflict
with my own then one of us is incorrect and I don't think it's me. If I believed
mine were incorrect then I would trade them for a set of views I believe are
correct. Am I open to the idea that Krugman may be correct and I am the one who
is incorrect? Sure, no problem. I'll join Krugman the day I think he's in the
right. But I have yet to see any convincing evidence of this."
Just to summarize, you said an example of a bad economist was Krugman. But, you
clarified. You said, "It is probably more accurate to say Krugman and his
acolytes are "incorrect" economists more so than a "bad" economists." That is
what promoted by initial question to you.
Now, if I may, you surface a great discussion point. You said that, if you
believed your views were incorrect then you trade them for a set of views that
are correct. I try to live my life that way. And I am always looking for
validation of my views so that I can change if needed. That is way I participate
in these discussions.
Now, to the point.
I disagree with Krugman often. Looking at the facts, I often come to different
conclusions than Krugman. However, just because I have a different conclusion
does not mean he is "incorrect." Unless you are a religious fundamentalist, you
have admit that there are many ways to "correct" without being "incorrect." (I
use the parable of the Blind Men Describing an Elephant, they all correctly
describe the elephant, but even though each of their descriptions is different,
none of their descriptions is "incorrect.")
For example, I think both Keynes and Hayek are correct in some of things they
say, and not correct in other things. In any case they observed a 1930's
economic world and that world does not exist in the 21st Century. So, even if
they might have been correct on some things that does not mean they are correct
today, or will be correct forever into the future.
As I had a concern with your use of the word "good" to begin our discussion, I
now have a concern with your word "correct."
Let me provide another example: The Law of Supply and Demand. I think that Law
generally applies; and that view or paradigm is "correct." And, I think there
are situations and contexts where the law of supply and demand does not apply;
and that view or paradigm is also "correct."
So my question to you is two fold. 1)At a high Level - can two different
paradigms or views both be correct? Or is there only one correct view? and 2)at
a specific level - Is my view that there are situations where the law of supply
and demand does not apply. correct or incorrect?
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 1 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions