PO210 Chapter Notes - Chapter 11B: Mens Rea, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Reverse Onus
Document Summary
Defense of necessity: must be clear and imminent danger, must be absence of legal alternative, har(cid:373) i(cid:374)fli(cid:272)ted (cid:373)ust (cid:271)e less tha(cid:374) (cid:449)hat"s (cid:271)ee(cid:374) a(cid:448)oided. Defense of mental disorder: section 16 of the code, key case: r v oomen, do(cid:374)"t just look at ge(cid:374)eral i(cid:374)telle(cid:272)tual a(cid:271)ility, (cid:271)ut are they able to apply that knowledge to their acts. Defense of (non-insane) automatism: sleepwalking case. R v daviault: bei(cid:374)g so dru(cid:374)k that you do(cid:374)"t ha(cid:448)e (cid:373)e(cid:374)s rea to (cid:272)o(cid:373)(cid:373)it (cid:272)ri(cid:373)e it was found that extreme intoxication cannot be used as a defense. Mr. big, and was convicted and found guilty of first degree murder: hart argued it was police entrapment (cid:449)as su(cid:272)(cid:272)essful i(cid:374) ha(cid:448)i(cid:374)g big"s evidence excluded on the basis of police entrapment, and was let in the. When the judge renders a decision with respect to sentencing, must consider: the offender, the victim, the society.
