AFM202 Chapter Notes - Chapter 3: Internal Audit, Performance Indicator, Revenue Recognition

28 views8 pages

OC2146671

17 Sep 2018

School

University of Waterloo

Department

Accounting & Financial Management

Course

AFM202

Professor

Alan Mc Naughton

For unlimited access to Textbook Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Requirements: risk assessment procedures and related activities, basis for the identification and assessment of risks of material misstatement, not enough appropriate audit evidence to base the audit opinion, must include the following. Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement: at the following levels, financial statement level, assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances and disclosures, auditor shall. Involves significant transactions with related parties: degree of subjectivity in the measurement of financial information related to the risk, especially involving a wide range of measurement uncertainty. If the new information is inconsistent with the audit evidence, the auditor shall revise the assessment and modify the further planned audit procedures. Documentation: discussion among the engagement team and significant decisions reached, key elements of the understanding obtained regarding each of the aspects of the entity and its environment. Internal control components: sources of information from which the understanding was obtained, risk assessment procedures performed.

Related Questions

A424

Homework #3

Due Tuesday, February 28

Worth 100 Points

Note: Students are expected to work independently (i.e., on your own) on all homework assignments. Please type and post to Canvas.

Part I. Risk Assessments

1. For each illustration, select the component of audit risk that is most directly illustrated. The components of audit risk may be used once, more than once, or not at all. (10 points, 1 point each).

Components: Inherent Risk (IR), Control risk (CR), or Detection Risk (DR)

a. A client fails to discover employee fraud on a timely basis because bank accounts are not reconciled monthly.

b. Cash is more susceptible to theft than an inventory of coal.

c. Confirmation of receivables by an auditor fails to detect a material misstatement.

d. Disbursements have occurred without proper approval.

e. There is inadequate segregation of duties.

f. A necessary substantive audit procedure is omitted.

g. Notes receivable are susceptible to material misstatement, assuming there are no related internal controls.

h. Technological developments make a major product obsolete.

i. The client is very close to violating debt covenants.

j. XYZ Company, a client, lacks sufficient working capital to continue operations.

2. Read Case 1.6, Nextcard, Inc. from our Casebook. Pretend you are the auditor for Nexcard, Inc. in the planning phase of the audit for FY 2000 and perform the following risk assessment procedures. That is, just focus on the information in the case prior to the discovery of the fraud (pages 83-86). (50 points total)

a. Perform a risk assessment as part of your audit plan for fiscal year 2000. Set or assess each component/factor of the audit risk model. Describe in detail how you set or assessed each factor (i.e., include specific risk factors from the case and explain how they influenced your assessment). (25 points)

b. Perform a fraud risk assessment for the risk of material misstatement due to fraudulent financial reporting. That is, identify and briefly describe specific fraud risk factors (i.e., more than 1) for each of the three components of the fraud risk triangle, specific to fraudulent financial reporting. (15 points)

c. Identify and describe one significant pervasive risk present during the Nextcard audit. In doing so, explain how the pervasive risk affects the risk of material misstatement. Then, describe how the auditor could respond to that pervasive risk (how could they change the audit plan to address that risk). (5 points)

d. Identify and describe one significant specific risk present during the Nextcard audit. In doing so, explain how the specific risk affects the risk of material misstatement. Then, describe how the auditor could respond to that specific risk (how could they change the audit plan to address that risk). (5 points)

Part II. Evidence and Management Assertions

1. For each of the following specific audit procedures, indicate the type of audit procedure it represents: (1) inspection of records or documents, (2) inspection of tangible assets, (3) observation, (4) inquiry, (5) confirmation, (6) recalculation, (7) reperformance, (8) analytical procedures, and (9) scanning. (10 points, 1 point each)

a. sending a written request to the entityâs customers requesting that they report the amount owed to the entity

b. examining large sales invoices for a period of two days before and after year-end to determine if sales are recorded in the proper period.

c. agreeing the total of the accounts receivable subsidiary ledger to the accounts receivable general ledger account.

d. discussing the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts with the credit manager.

e. comparing the current-year gross profit percentage with the gross profit percentage for the last four years.

f. examining a new plastic extrusion machine to ensure that this major acquisition was received.

g. watching the entityâs warehouse personnel count the raw materials inventory.

h. performing test counts of the warehouse personnelâs count of the raw material.

i. obtaining a letter from the entityâs attorney indicating that there were no lawsuits in progress against the entity.

j. tracing the prices used by the entityâs billing program for pricing sales invoices to the entityâs approved price list.

2. For each of the audit procedures listed above in Part II. 1. (a-j), identify the category (assertions about classes of transactions and events, or assertions about account balances) and identify the primary management assertion being tested. (30 points, 3 points each)

turquoisesheep410

2â31. Simulation
Casa Royale, Inc., a nonpublic company, retained Ying and Company CPA to perform an
audit of the fi nancial statements for the current year. Howard Smythe, the partner in charge of
the audit, drafted the following unmodifi ed report:

To the Management of Casa Royale, Inc.:
We have examined the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Casa Royale, Inc., and
its subsidiaries, as of December 31, 20X1, and the related consolidated statements of income,
retained earnings, and cash fl ows for the years then ended.
Managementâs Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated
fi nancial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control
relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated fi nancial statements that are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditorâs Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these fi nancial statements based on our audit. We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated fi nancial statements are free of material
misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures
in the consolidated fi nancial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditorâs
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated
fi nancial statements, whether due to fraud or illegal acts. In making those risk assessments, the
auditor considers internal control relevant to the entityâs preparation and fair presentation of
the consolidated fi nancial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the entityâs internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting
policies used and the reasonableness of signifi cant accounting estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is adequate to provide a basis for our audit
opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated fi nancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the fi nancial position of Casa Royale, Inc., and its subsidiaries as of December 31,
20X1, and the results of their operations and their cash fl ows for the years then ended in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America.
Howard Smythe , Partner
Phoenix, Arizona
February 12, 20X2
Reviewerâs Comments
Comment Is
Correct (yes or no)
a. The report should not be addressed to management.
b. The report should indicate that we have âaudited,â rather than âexamined,â
the fi nancial statements (fi rst paragraph after introduction).
c. The report should not indicate anything concerning managementâs
responsibility for internal control.
d. The report should state that the auditorsâ responsibility is to express
âreasonable assurance,â not an opinion (fi rst paragraph under âauditorâsâ
responsibility).
e. The audit is designed to assess risks of material misstatements due to
errors or fraud; the term âillegal actsâ is incorrect (second paragraph
under auditorâs responsibility).
f. The report should not refer to the auditors âevaluating the appropriateness
of accounting policies,â since those are the responsibility of management.
g. The evidence should be suffi cient and appropriate rather than âadequateâ
(third paragraph under auditorâs responsibility).

Reviewerâs Comments
Comment Is
Correct (yes or no)
h. The opinion should not include âin all material respectsâ since the auditors
are providing an opinion on the accuracy of the fi nancial statements
(opinion paragraph).
i. The opinion should be on âaccounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America,â not on auditing standards (opinion paragraph).
j. The signature on the report should be that of the CPA fi rm, not that of
the partner.

blushcrocodile696

13-35 (Objectives 13-3, 13-4) McClain Plastics has been an auditclient of Belcor, Rich, Smith & Barnes, CPAs (BRS&B), forseveral years. McClain Plastics was started by Evers McClain, whoowns 51% of the companyâs stock. The balance is owned by about 20stockholders, who are investors with no operationalresponsibilities. McClain Plastics makes products that have plasticas their primary material. Some are made to order, but mostproducts are made for inventory. An example of aMcClain-manufactured product is a plastic chair pad that is used ina carpeted office. Another is a plastic bushing that is used withcertain fastener systems.

McClain has grown from a small, two-product company, when theyfirst engaged BRS&B, to a successful, diverse company. At thetime Randall Sessions of BRS&B became manager of the audit,annual sales had grown to $200 million and profits to $10.9million. Historically, the company presented no unusual auditproblems, and BRS&B had issued an unmodified opinion everyyear.

The audit approach BRS&B always used on the audit of McClainPlastics was a âsubstantiveâ audit approach. Under this approach,the in-charge auditor obtained an understanding of internal controlas part of the risk assessment procedures, but control risk wasassessed at the maximum (100%). Extensive analytical procedureswere done on the income statement, and unusual fluctuations wereinvestigated. Detailed audit procedures emphasized balance sheetaccounts. The theory was that if the balance sheet accounts werecorrect at year-end and had been audited as of the beginning of theyear, then retained earnings and the income statement must becorrect.

Part I

In evaluating the audit approach for McClain for the currentyearâs audit, Sessions believed that a substantive approach wasreally only appropriate for the audits of small nonpubliccompanies. In his judgment, McClain Plastics, with sales of $200million and 146 employees, had reached the size where it was noteconomical, and probably not wise, to concentrate all the tests onthe balance sheet. Furthermore, although McClain is not a publiccompany, Sessions recognized that similar public companies arerequired by Section 404 of the SarbanesâOxley Act and related PCAOBstandards to have an integrated audit of the financial statementsand internal control over financial reporting. Therefore, hedesigned an audit program that emphasized identifying internalcontrols in all major transaction cycles and included tests ofcontrols. The intended economic benefit of this âreducing controlriskâ approach was that the time spent testing controls would bemore than offset by reduced tests of details of the balance sheetaccounts.

In planning tests of inventories, Sessions used the audit riskmodel included in auditing standards to determine the number ofinventory items BRS&B would test at year-end. Because of thenumber of different products, features, sizes, and colors,McClainâs inventory consisted of 2,450 different items. These weremaintained on a perpetual inventory management system that used arelational database.

In using the audit risk model for inventories, Sessions believedthat an audit risk of 5% was acceptable. He assessed inherent riskas high (100%) because inventory, by its nature, is subject to manytypes of misstatements. Based on his understanding of the relevanttransaction cycles, Sessions believed that internal controls wereeffective. He therefore assessed control risk as low (50%) beforeperforming tests of controls. Sessions also planned to usesubstantive analytical procedures for tests of inventory. Theseplanned tests included comparing gross profit margins by month andreviewing for slow-moving items. Sessions believed that these testswould provide assurance of 40%. Substantive tests of details wouldinclude tests of inventory quantities, costs, and net realizablevalues at an interim date two months before year-end. Cutoff testswould be done at year-end. Inquiries and substantive analyticalprocedures would be relied on for assurance about events betweenthe interim audit date and fiscal year-end.

Required

Decide which of the following will likely be done under both areducing control risk approach and a substantive approach:

Assess inherent risk.

Obtain an understanding of internal control.

Perform tests of controls.

Perform substantive analytical procedures.

Assess planned detection risk.

What advantages does the reducing control risk approach Sessionsplanned to use have over the substantive approach previously usedin the audit of McClain Plastics?

What advantages did the substantive approach have over thereducing control risk approach?

Part II

The engagement partner agreed with Sessionsâs recommendedapproach. In planning the audit evidence for detailed inventorytests, the audit risk model was applied with the followingresults:

PDR=AATIRÃCRÃAPR

where:

PDR=PlanneddetectionriskAAR=acceptableauditriskIR=inherentriskCR=controlriskAPR=analyticalproceduresrisk

Therefore, using Sessionsâs assessments and judgments asdescribed previously,

PDR=.051.0Ã.5Ã.6PDR=.17

Required

Explain what .17 means in this audit.

Calculate PDR assuming that Sessions had assessedcontrol risk at 100% and all other risks as they are stated.

Explain the effect of your answer in requirement b. on theplanned audit procedures and sample size in the audit of inventorycompared with the .17 calculated by Sessions.

Part III

Although the planning went well, the actual testing yielded somesurprises. When conducting tests of controls over acquisitions andadditions to the perpetual inventory, the staff person performingthe tests found that the deviation rates for several key controlswere significantly higher than expected. As a result, the staffperson considered internal control to be operating lesseffectively, supporting an 80% control risk rather than the 50%level used. Accordingly, the staff person âreworkedâ the audit riskmodel as follows:

PDR=.051.0Ã.8Ã.6PDR=.10

A 10% test of details risk still seemed to the staff person tobe in the âmoderateâ range, so he recommended no increase inplanned sample size for substantive tests.

Required

Do you agree with the staff personâs revised judgments about theeffect of tests of controls on planned substantive tests? Explainthe nature and basis of any disagreement. If BRS&B was alsoissuing a report on internal control over financial reporting,describe the implications of these results on the auditorâsinternal control report.

AFM202 Chapter Notes - Chapter 3: Internal Audit, Performance Indicator, Revenue Recognition

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

AFM202 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Internal Audit, Financial Statement, Internal Control

AFM202 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Audit Evidence, Accounting

AFM202 Chapter Notes - Chapter 1: Financial Audit, Jargon, Audit Evidence

Related Questions