SOC 3750 Chapter Notes - Chapter 6: Rein, Anomie, Police Brutality
Document Summary
In this exploratory study, we try to gain a better understanding of motivations for police dishonesty through in- depth, structured interviews of 10 members of an urban police department. Frameworks of interpretation: the officer responses elicited in this study can best be understood using two interpretive frameworks. (cid:455)kes a(cid:374)d matza(cid:859)s (cid:894)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1009)(cid:1011)(cid:895) neutralization techniques as they pertain to unanticipated behaviour or the conduct of members of deviant groups: (cid:272)ott a(cid:374)d l(cid:455)(cid:373)a(cid:374)(cid:859)s fo(cid:396)(cid:373)ulatio(cid:374) i(cid:374)(cid:272)ludes (cid:455)kes a(cid:374)d matza(cid:859)s (cid:894)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1009)(cid:1011)(cid:895) te(cid:272)h(cid:374)i(cid:395)ues, (cid:271)ut (cid:449)ith so(cid:373)e additio(cid:374)al detail. The former includes statements of denial of responsibility, that is, accident; defeasibility (lack of a mental element); biological drives (or other fatalistic forces); and scapegoating (a response to the behaviour or attitudes of others. According to most officers interviewed, the internal discipline system does little to curb illegal police stops. Searches without probable cause: almost all the officers believe that it is sometimes necessary to conduct searches without probable cause.