MCS 3040 Chapter : DISCUSS 2.docx

• School: University of Guelph
• Department: Marketing and Consumer Studies
• Course: MCS 3040
• Professor: Joseph Radocchia

Document Summary

Make a short conclusion of her statement my opinions, litigation can be slow, high cost, stressful, imposed decision, and no choice over process and decision maker, and usually bad for relationships and bring unpleasant publicity. In contrast, adr will be cheaper and quicker because it is less discovery and no appeal; it is controllable, private, helps to reduce the degree of contentiousness connected to the litigation and thus protects the relationship. For one of the forms in adr-arbitration, the advantage is choice of process and arbitrator, decision may be binding. Moreover, even if we are in court, we can still use ard. Many courts set up dispute resolution programs that require parties to take part in some form of adr before going to the court. However, not all of the disputes are suitable to use adr.