CH ENGR C115 Quiz: Group Presentation Rubric
9 Jan 2019
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
University of california los angeles, chemical & biomolecular engineering department. Bioengrm215-1 / ch engrc115-1 / ch engrcm215-1- fall 2018/ presentation evaluation. Name: (will be separated from evaluation before distribution to speaker) Exp. methods & observations clearly and concisely presented. Communication: excellent= this is engaging to read. I can follow everything clearly, it"s obvious you know the subject and can communicate effectively. Name: (will be separated from evaluation before distribution to speaker: good= the paper explains concepts in your own words, demonstrating understanding. I can follow this: not-so-good= i"m confused by your paper. Motivation: excellent= the paper clearly defines the purpose of the project, motivates my interest in the subject and accomplishes the goals of the project, good= the paper solves a problem. You show your own interest and proficiency in the subject: not-so-good= the paper does not establish an incentive for the reader. Quality: excellent= the paper has impressive depth and originality, all important concepts and details are covered.
