PSY 1004 Study Guide - Quiz Guide: Torsten Wiesel, Daniel Kahneman, Roger Wolcott Sperry

89 views9 pages
Topic 1
Challenges
The Freud Problem
Exaggerated contributions
Theories built on case studies
Believed all humans/ mindset are explained as originating from childhood experiences
and conflicting unconscious mental agents
“Pop” psychology
Challenges
Major Contributions
David Hubel and Torsten wiesel- visual systems
Daniel Kahneman- cognitive processing
Herbert Simon- decision making
Roger Sperry- “split brain”
Diversity of topics
APA divisions
Young science
Complexity of human behavior
Abstract concepts
Non Scientific ways knowing
Authority- believe what you are told from a credible or powerful figure or course
Relies on method of faith
Rational Method
Drawing conclusions based on reasoning
Logical conclusions based on prior information
Ex: all 3 year olds are afraid of the dark
Amy is 3 years old
Therefore amy is scared of the dark
Younger generations are more technologically advanced than older
generations
Technology is more recent in history, older people aren’t recent in history
Rational method problems
Arguments dont always logically support conclusion
Ex. all apples are fruits
Some fruits are oranges
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Thus, some apples are oranges
Logic fallacy (errors in reasoning)
Non sequitur logical fallacy- some mistake in your reason, not really related to each other
Post hoc ergo prophet hoc - because two things happen simultaneously doesn’t mean that
they’re related in a meaningful way
False-binary opposition- you’re either for something or against something, all or nothing,
false dilemma
Non Scientific ways of knowing
Intuition
Implicit/instinctive ways of knowing - truthiness
Based on common sense
Related to method of tenacity (gut feeling)
Can be counterintuitive or contradictory
Based on your life experiences
Teaching your grandma
No real systematic design
Ways of knowing- Empirical
Relies on experience
Objective
Formulating specific questions and systematically finding answers
I’ve had to teach my parents things about technology
Method of authority
Rational method
Method of intuition
Empirical method
Characteristics of Science
Scientific method
Define a problem
Form a hypothesis
Generate a testable prediction
Systematic observations
Support, refute, or refine the original hypothesis
Progressive/Tentative
Self correcting w/ new evidence
Mistakes made public
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Paradigm shifts- based on what the current status is on one problem
Parsimonious
Simple explanations are usually best
Occam’s Razor - theory that the simplest explanation is probably the best
Testable
Falsifiable- you should be able to support or show false
Replicable (peer review, public)
Characteristics of Science
Concerned with Theory- why and how
Fact- piece of daata recognized as valid
Theory- describes a large body of evidence, summarizes facts and hypotheses
after
repeated testing
Theory vs law
Law more commonly used as mathematically statement but in science, essentially
the same meaning
A key feature of science and the empirical method is objectivity
Not influenced by researcher bias
Assumptions of Science
Regularity- the world exists without us realizing it
Realism- deals with the fact that things that happen here remain constant
Causality - all events have causes
Discoverable- in science there’s an idea that everything can be discovered
Rationality - way of knowing is through rationing, to a certain extent we can understand
the world through logic but we do have to be careful of logical fallacies
Pseudoscience
Ideas presented as science but lack key characteristics of science!
Characteristics of pseudoscience
jargon - common language used in a specific field
Secrecy
Not refutable
Negative results discounted or excused- it doesn’t happen to you because you
don’t believe
Testimonials- someones account of what has happened to them
Vividness effect - my grandpa smoked every day and he was fine
Placebo effects may account for success of pseudoscientific “treatments”
33% of people reported they helped them
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 9 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Believed all humans/ mindset are explained as originating from childhood experiences and conflicting unconscious mental agents. David hubel and torsten wiesel- visual systems. Authority - believe what you are told from a credible or powerful figure or course. Ex: all 3 year olds are afraid of the dark. Therefore amy is scared of the dark. Younger generations are more technologically advanced than older generations. Technology is more recent in history, older people aren"t recent in history. Non sequitur logical fallacy- some mistake in your reason, not really related to each other. Post hoc ergo prophet hoc - because t wo things happen simultaneously doesn"t mean that. False-binary opposition- you"re either for something or against something, all or nothing, they"re related in a meaningful way false dilemma. Related to method of tenacity (gut feeling) Formulating specific questions and systematically finding answers. I"ve had to teach my parents things about technology. Support, refute, or refine the original hypothesis.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers

Related Documents