ACCT 2000 Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Direct Labor Cost, Vise, Variable Cost
Document Summary
Get access
Related Documents
Related Questions
5- 2 Colombo Soft-Serve Frozen Yogurt
In 1994, General Mills Incorporated, a $6 billion consumer goods company, acquired Colombo Frozen Yogurt. General Mills Inc. (GMI) believed they could add Colombo frozen yogurt to their existing product lineup to increase net sales with little addition in marketing cost.
Frozen yogurt is sold through two distinct segments â independent shops and impulse locations such as cafeterias, colleges, and buffets. Frozen yogurt is the main business for the shops whereas yogurt is incremental to the impulse locationsâ main business. GMIâs large sales force already served the impulse market.
The financial results in the first couple of years were mixed. Earnings increased slightly and then dropped each year even though sales volume was relatively flat. In total, merchandising costs dropped, while pricing promotion rates escalated. The GMI sales force focused on the impulse segments and pricing promotions were believed to be driving volume increases. However, volume in the shop segment declined at alarming rates and there was widespread dissatisfaction in the sales organization. While GMI knew sales by segment, they didnât track costs by segment. Instead costs were allocated based on sales dollars. The situation was ripe for a clearer look using ABC methods.
TODAYâS FROZEN YOGURT MARKET STRUCTURE:
When Colombo Yogurt Company began marketing soft-serve frozen yogurt in the early 1980âs, their main distribution was through independent yogurt shops. In the early 90âs, they faced competition from franchise operations such as TCBY and Freshens that replaced many of the independent yogurt shops. And the market changed as Foodservice operators such as cafeterias, colleges, and buffets started to add soft-serve yogurt to their business. By the late 90âs, these Impulse locations accounted for 2/3 of the soft-serve market.
In the late 90âs, Shop sales began to increase with the addition of distinctive new products such as smoothies, boosters, and granitas. The Shops make their living from the soft-serve business and must innovate or go out of business (as thousands have done in the last decade). On the other hand, the Impulse locations make their living from other items and the soft-serve trade is only performance topspin. These firms are unwilling to take any risk (new equipment or extra labor) to serve highly differentiated products like smoothies or granitas.
THE GMI-COLOMBO MARKETING PLAN:
The GMI Foodservice Division markets brands such as Cheerios, Yoplait, Betty Crocker, Gold Medal Flour, Hamburger Helper, Pop-Secret, and Chex Snack to Food Management Firms, Hospitals, and schools. Colombo yogurt was added to this product lineup and the Foodservice sales force covered both Shop and Impulse locations.
Salesforce: Colomboâs salesforce was merged into the Foodservice salesforce. Customers were reassigned to salespeople who already serviced that geographical area. The salespeople varied in their reaction to the product. Some found shops easy to sell to while others avoided the shops despite the possible lost commission. Many spent a lot of time helping their impulse customers understand how to use the machinery.
Merchandising Promotions: Colombo traditionally charged the Shops for merchandising that was large scale and eye popping (neon signs). The Shops used these signs to draw customers inside. GMI chose not to charge for merchandising and to provide the same large scale merchandising to both Shops and Impulse locations. Shops were very interested in the kits while many Impulse locations didnât even hang them up.
Pricing Promotions: Pricing promotions are a mainstay of GMIâs impulse location approach. GMIâs salesforce generally used these promotion events as an opportunity to visit their accounts and take advantage of the occasion to meet service needs and sell other products that may not be featured.
GMI made price promotions available to both segments of the market. While the deals were typically around $5 per case, they averaged $3 per case against all the volume shipped during the year. GMI marketing knew price was not a major decision factor for Shops and they did not target pricing promotions to them. However, Shops were aware of the promotions and took advantage of them.
THE BUSINESS STATUS â PRE-ABC:
PROFIT AND LOSS BY SEGMENT â PRE-ABC | Impulse Segment | Yogurt Shops | Total |
Sales in cases | 1,200,000 | 300,000 | 1,500,000 |
Sales revenue | $23,880,000 | $5,970,000 | $29,850,000 |
Less: Price Promotions | - $ 3,600,000 | - $ 900,000 | - $ 4,500,000 |
Net Sales | $20,280,000 | $5,070,000 | $25,350,000 |
Less: Cost of Goods Sold | - $13,800,000 | - $3,450,000 | - $17,250,000 |
Gross Margin | $ 6,480,000 | $1,620,000 | $ 8,100,000 |
Less: Merchandising | - $ 1,380,000 | - $ 345,000 | - $ 1,725,000 |
Less: SG&A | - $ 948,000 | - $ 237,000 | - $ 1,185,000 |
Net income | $ 4,152,000 | $1,038,000 | $ 5,190,000 |
ABC ANALYSIS OF COST OF GOODS SOLD:
Cost of Goods Sold is made up of $14,250,000 for ingredients, packaging, and storage and $3,000,000 for pick/pack and shipping. Since the product is the same across segments, the cost to produce should be the same. However, pick/pack and shipping costs were found to vary with whether or not the order was for a full pallet. Full pallets cost $75 to pick and ship whereas individual orders cost $2.25 per case. There are 75 cases in a pallet and the segments differ in their utilization of full pallets as shown below.
Impulse Segment | Yogurt Shops | Total | |
Cases in full Pallets | 60,000 | 240,000 | 300,000 |
Individual cases | 1,140,000 | 60,000 | 1,200,000 |
Total cases | 1,200,000 | 300,000 | 1,500,000 |
ABC ANALYSIS OF MERCHANDISING:
Merchandising costs consist mainly of kits costing $500 each. A review of where the kits were sent indicated that 3,450 kits were sent out and 90 of them were sent to shops.
ABC ANALYSIS OF SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE:
Since sales representatives service several products, their costs are allocated to the various products based on gross sales dollars. GMI gave diaries to 10% of the sales force in randomly selected markets of the country and asked them to track their time in activity classifications for 60 days. The diaries indicated that sales reps spent almost 3 times as much time on the yogurt than GMI had estimated. The total allocation to Yogurt jumped from $1,185,000 to $3,900,000. Of their time spent on Yogurt, only 1% of the time was spent on the shops.
REQUIRED:
1. Briefly summarize Colomboâs competitive environment and General Millsâ strategy in response to that environment.
2. Using the ABC analysis, determine new segment profitability statements.
3. Based on your analysis in Questions 1 and 2, what changes would you suggest to General Mills? Give specific examples and explain.
Required: After reading the Bye, Bye SOX? Article comment on the issue of small business compliance with Section 404 of SOX
Bye, Bye, SOX? | |
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) | SOX compliance has been extended |
may be declawed by upcoming | four times, but they wonât need to |
U.S. Congress and | comply at all if the Garrett-Adler |
Supreme Court decisions. | amendment makes it to the Senate |
The House of Representatives | floor as a standalone bill. |
recently voted to approve the | SOX also established the |
Garrett-Adler amendment, which | PCAOB to oversee and regulate |
would exempt small companies | audit firms. PCAOB operates under |
from SOX Section 404 provisions, | the supervision of the Securities |
while the Supreme Court is considering | and Exchange Commission (SEC), |
the constitutionality of the | which also appoints PCAOB members. |
Public Company Accounting Oversight | It is funded by fees charged to |
Board (PCAOB). | audited firms. When it was established, |
These developments may have | Congress wanted the board |
long-term implications for SOX, the | to be separate, with its own funding |
2002 legislation passed in the wake | stream, and outside normal civil |
of the Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco | service laws so it could attract |
scandals. The outcomes may also | highly qualified specialists. PCAOB |
have implications for records managers, | membersâ salaries are more than |
information technology specialists, | $500,000 and are reviewed by the |
and compliance officers | SEC. |
who devise and implement company | Pro-business advocates, represented |
controls. | by the Free Enterprise |
Section 404 of SOX requires | Fund, argue that the PCAOBâs governance |
company auditors to attest to the | structure is unconstitutional |
soundness of the firmâs internal | because it is an independent |
controls and financial statements. | agency that does not allow for the |
Internal controls may include anything | president to appoint members. Additionally, |
from transaction approval authorizations | because only the president |
to records retention | can remove SEC commissioners |
programs. This provision is widely | for cause, and because |
blamed for an increase in auditorsâ | the SEC can only remove PCAOB |
fees, as well as increased expenditures | members for cause, some court |
to ensure that proper internal | members believe this is a formerly |
controls are in place. | unrecognized limit of the presidentâs |
Small firms â those with | powers that may contradict |
less than $75 million in | the constitution. |
market capitalization | The Supreme Court will take up |
â have protested that | the issue soon, and some legal experts |
compliance with SOX 404 would | believe that SOX could be |
cost them a disproportionate share | abolished completely if the court |
of their earnings. The complaint is | rules the PCAOB unconstitutional. |
supported by an independent study | |
conducted at Pennsylvania State | |
University, which showed that | |
firms just over the $75 million | |
mark paid nearly $700,000 more in | |
audit fees and had average earnings | |
of negative $1.4 million in 2004 |