POL SCI 123S Final: PS123S Final Terms list and review
10 May 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
î˘
Customary Lawî˘
Statutory Lawî˘
î˘
Genderî˘î˘
Sexî˘
Gender normsî˘
Gender Analysisî˘
Male standardî˘
Substantive Equalityî˘
Formal/ Aristotelian Equalityî˘
GE v. Gilbertî˘
Gender Socializationî˘
î˘
The Rights Paradigmî˘
Rightholderî˘
Addresseeî˘
High Priority Goalî˘
Remedyî˘
î˘
Implementation Costsî˘
Conflict Costsî˘
î˘
Positive Rightsî˘
Negative Rightî˘
Legal (positive) rightsî˘
Moral rightsî˘
Justified Moral (natural) Rightsî˘
Accepted Moral (natural) Rightsî˘
î˘
Universalityî˘
Inalienabilityî˘
Citizenship Rightsî˘
î˘
Nickelâs 6 steps to a rightî˘
The entitlement approachî˘
The entitlement plus approachî˘
The legally implemented entitlement approachî˘
The Feasibility Standardî˘
All Four Types of Human Rightsî˘
î˘
ICCPRî˘
ICESCPRî˘
Civil/ political/ social/ economic/ cultural rightsî˘
International Bill of Rightsî˘
Western Rights Traditionî˘
Neutrality of Lawî˘
Treaty/ Treaty lawî˘
Commission on Human Rightsî˘
Prima Facie Rightsî˘
UN Declaration of Human Rights (1948)î˘
International Lawî˘
Domestic Jurisdiction Clauseî˘
Un General Assembly Declaration on Violence Against Womenî˘î˘
Shadow Reportsî˘
Policy Documentsî˘
General Consultative Statusî˘
î˘
Savage-Victim-Savior (SVS) Constructionî˘î˘
Mutuaâs argumentî˘
Genetic Fallacyî˘
NGOs/INGOsî˘
Specieismî˘
Khadijaî˘
î˘
Convention Against Torture (1984)î˘
Tortureî˘
FGMî˘
î˘
Immigration-Nationality Actî˘
Persecutionî˘
Refugeeî˘
Asylumî˘
Board of Immigration Appealsî˘
Kasingaî˘
î˘
FAMILY LAWî˘
Moudawanaî˘
Personal Status Lawsî˘
Muslim Personal Lawî˘
Triple Talaqî˘
Bangladesh uniform family codeî˘î˘
î˘
Equality Without Reservation Campaignî˘
All Pakistan Womenâs Association (APWA)î˘
Fourth World Conference on Womenî˘
Cultural Islamî˘
Document Summary
Un general assembly declara ion on violence agains women. Ar icle 16 of cedaw - marriage and family life. Echr ar icle 8 - righ o respec for priva e and family life. Echr ar icle 9 - freedom o manifes religion and beliefs. Margin of apprecia ion (rela es o he france face veil ban) California civil code s 1708. 6: or of dv. Parsal d (proyec o de apoyo a la reforma sec or sal d) The righ s paradigm incl de five elemen s: righ s holder + high priori y goal+ addressee + addressee"s d y + remedy. In his paradigm, righ s holders are individ als and are all eq al. Righ s are limi ed o ex remely impor an socie al goals. The addressee for righ s, or he ac or responsible for providing he high priori y goal is.
