PHI1101- Final Exam Guide - Comprehensive Notes for the exam ( 31 pages long!)

• School: University of Ottawa
• Department: Philosophy
• Course: PHI 1101
• Professor: Vincent Bergeron

Document Summary

To not exist would be a serious flaw, so the idea of this argument is that if you accept these two premises, it looks to the person making the argument that you then have to accept the conclusion. By saying (cid:3247)god is perfect(cid:3248) you are really saying (cid:3247)there is something that exists that is god and that is perfect(cid:3248) secular argument. You are asking for something to be accepted and are passing it as if it is a good argument. Conclusion is accurate, but the reasoning behind the conclusion is false. If someone holds specific beliefs their conclusion would rely on their beliefs to hold those facts. As far as reasoning goes, this is flawless because you have to accept the premises to get the conclusion. I don"t know everyone who has ever lived. Therefore i know logic better than everyone who has ever lived. Conclusion is false, but the premises are accurate.