PSYO 3082 Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Demand Characteristics, Classical Conditioning, Subliminal Stimuli
14 Jan 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Nonsense words were displayed for 4 ms prior to the. Was not a between subjects design: because all participants were exposed to the same stimulus, the difference was which word ended up in each condition. It was a within subjects design because the iv was experienced by everyone o. The hypothesis we were trying to replicate was the effect of repeated exposure. The point of counterbalancing was to wash out differences/preferences we have for certain stimuli. Use a one-way anova to compare the data (since there is only one iv: do a post-hoc test to find out where the differences lie. Could argue the words didn"t have an effect because people didn"t see them ratings from 0-6) Zajonc only showed a portion of his rating scale so our graph looks different than his: ours was in the context of the measurement we used (graph included the.
