LAWS 3306 Study Guide - Comprehensive Final Exam Guide - Parliament Of Singapore, Canada, Green Bay Packers
20 Nov 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Evaluation: midterm (40%, in class, 2 hours, 4 sa [4/8] (20 marks) & essay [1/2] (20 marks, final exam (60%, cumulative, 4 sa [4/8] (20 marks) & essay [1/2] (20 marks) & laws: victim fine surcharge, sentencing tools. If there is no effect on reliability of evidence, cc does not worry about it. Increased protections to young persons accused of criminal offences: due process model failed (i. e. in miranda case, did not account for the rise of feminism. Critics: empirical irrelevance, studies of the cjs overtime have shown all actors in the system share common goals (organization wise) 5: non-punitive model, resembles a continuous circle/cycle, focuses on prevention of crime, proactive > reactive re: victims. Identifying services needed for at-risk individuals of becoming perps or victims. 6: many cases dealing w police behaviour did not result in exclusion of evidence, ex. *enactment of charter shifted canada"s justice system from a crime control model to a due process model.
