MLL217 Study Guide - Final Guide: Rutile, Ansett Australia, Richard Howland Hunt

116 views7 pages

Document Summary

Economic loss consequential upon damage to property belonging to defendant or a third party. Concept of (cid:858)pu(cid:396)e(cid:859) e(cid:272)o(cid:374)o(cid:373)i(cid:272) loss (cid:858)pu(cid:396)e(cid:859) e(cid:272)o(cid:374)o(cid:373)i(cid:272) loss = loss (cid:374)ot (cid:272)o(cid:374)se(cid:395)ue(cid:374)tial upo(cid:374) pe(cid:396)so(cid:374)al i(cid:374)ju(cid:396)(cid:455) o(cid:396) p(cid:396)ope(cid:396)t(cid:455) da(cid:373)age vs. Consequential pecuniary loss (such as loss of earning capacity or medical expenses resulting from physical/psychiatric injury: only the former is a special duty situation; the latter is merely a claim for damages for physical injury (a simple case) Economic loss consequential upon damage to property of defendant or third party. P suffers economic loss because d has negligently damaged their own property or the property of a third party. Johnson tiles pty ltd v esso pty ltd. Perre v apand: defendant sent a new brand of potatoes to the plaintiff that were infected. Prohibited from being exported if the crops had been grown within 20kms of the wilting.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers

Related Documents