Describe the potential cost to you of enrolling in this “macroeconomics” course. Examine which factor—the time or money you must forfeit—is more significant when making decisions. Examine how scarcity affects your day-to-day existence.
(you can Include personal stories or real-life examples) 

when you do it remember to use the following key terms: scarcity, specialization, the law of diminishing marginal utility, budget constraint, allocate efficiency, productive efficiency, sunk cost, utility, etc)  

For this week's discussion, come up with an example of diminishing marginal utility that you've encountered recently. This example could be a product or service you've purchased or an experience you've had.

Match the following health-economic value models with their definition below: budget impact model, cost analysis, cost-effectiveness model, cost-utility analysis

Compares the money spent on competing treatments over time from a payer, provider and/or societal perspective

Assesses incremental costs over the incremental QALYs gained for one treatment when compared to another

Calculates per-member, per-month costs within a treatable population

Evaluates the total incremental cost of the intervention per incremental unit of net health benefit experienced by the patient

A. Cost analysis

B. Budget impact model

C. Cost-effectiveness model

D. Cost-utility analysis

Question: The US economy did recover from the numerous crises of the 1970s to some extent, but the period (1981–now) was very different from the 'golden age' of the 1950s and 1960s. Name and describe a few of the most significant contrasts between these two economic eras (NOT the crisis years of the 1970s) for this task, as well as some of the possible explanations.

In other words, how do these two eras differ from one another, and how can we account for those differences?

Can someone tell me if this conclusion it’s good?:

The shift in economic policy framework since 1981 toward a more neoliberal one may be one explanation for these disparities. Deregulation, privatization, and free trade are prioritized in this framework with the hope that these measures will promote economic growth and improved productivity. Critics contend that these policies, which put the priorities of businesses and the wealthy ahead of those of workers and society as a whole, are to blame for the rise in income disparity and the reduction in productivity development.

A further factor in the rise in income inequality and reduction in employment stability since the 1980s has been the decline in unionization and the erosion of worker safeguards.