Please Share Journal Article Review related with any of the topics in Advanced Project Management.
Point to be addressed in reviewing the articles:
A. Description of the Study
1. What is the main purpose of the article under-review?
2. What is the central argument of the article under-review?
3. Why is the research being conducted & why is it considered significant?
4. Were the research questions, objectives or hypothesis (es) clearly stated?
B. Literature Evaluation
5. Does the literature review seem thorough & up to date?
6. Does the content of the literature review relate directly to the research problem?
C. Conceptual Framework
7. Does the research use a theoretical and/or conceptual model?
8. What theories or approaches of the topic under-review are addressed?
9. How is the concepts under-review defined in this article?
10. What major ideas or core issues are discussed with regard to the specific behavioral study under-review?
11. Does the model guides the research and seem appropriate
D. Research Methodology
12. What research design is adopted in this article?
- Describe the study design – is it appropriate?
- How was the research conducted? (The study procedure itself) & data collected
- Were the subject’s rights protected?
13. What was the sampling design
- Who were the participants/ subjects?
- Were the inclusion/exclusion criteria specified?
- How representative is the sample?
- was there any selection bias evident in the sample selection?
14. Analysis
- How were the data analyzed?
- Do the selected statistical tests (if any) appear appropriate?
- Were the results significant?
E. Results
15. What were the findings of the study?
16. Are the results presented in a clear and understandable way?
17. How did the authors interpret the results?
18. Was there any study limitation discussed?
F. Subject matter significance
19. - What were the implications of this study to practitioners?
20. - How does the study contribute to the body of knowledge?
21. - Could the study be replicated?
22. - What additional questions does the study raise?
G. Over All Evaluation
23. What comments do you have on the strength and weakness of the article?
24. What lessons are learned in terms of writing scientific articles?
Please Share Journal Article Review related with any of the topics in Advanced Project Management.
Point to be addressed in reviewing the articles:
A. Description of the Study
1. What is the main purpose of the article under-review?
2. What is the central argument of the article under-review?
3. Why is the research being conducted & why is it considered significant?
4. Were the research questions, objectives or hypothesis (es) clearly stated?
B. Literature Evaluation
5. Does the literature review seem thorough & up to date?
6. Does the content of the literature review relate directly to the research problem?
C. Conceptual Framework
7. Does the research use a theoretical and/or conceptual model?
8. What theories or approaches of the topic under-review are addressed?
9. How is the concepts under-review defined in this article?
10. What major ideas or core issues are discussed with regard to the specific behavioral study under-review?
11. Does the model guides the research and seem appropriate
D. Research Methodology
12. What research design is adopted in this article?
- Describe the study design – is it appropriate?
- How was the research conducted? (The study procedure itself) & data collected
- Were the subject’s rights protected?
13. What was the sampling design
- Who were the participants/ subjects?
- Were the inclusion/exclusion criteria specified?
- How representative is the sample?
- was there any selection bias evident in the sample selection?
14. Analysis
- How were the data analyzed?
- Do the selected statistical tests (if any) appear appropriate?
- Were the results significant?
E. Results
15. What were the findings of the study?
16. Are the results presented in a clear and understandable way?
17. How did the authors interpret the results?
18. Was there any study limitation discussed?
F. Subject matter significance
19. - What were the implications of this study to practitioners?
20. - How does the study contribute to the body of knowledge?
21. - Could the study be replicated?
22. - What additional questions does the study raise?
G. Over All Evaluation
23. What comments do you have on the strength and weakness of the article?
24. What lessons are learned in terms of writing scientific articles?
