Based on immanuel kants “The Good Will and the Categorical Imperative” pick three points to support teach three of these points

1. emphasizes the importance of treating people as ends rather than means

2. Promoted the idea of universal ethics.

3. Stress is the significance of individual autonomy in decision making.

For each three of the point above, first read Immanuel Kants “ the Good will in the categorical imperative” and then proof for each three of the points above to support them and then, after for each one, explain how this proof supports the point

Formatting should look like this:

Point 1- immanuel kant emphasizes the importance of treating people as ends rather than means

proof- “ “

explain how this proof supports the point-

and same format for the other two points

https://123philosophy.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/kant-the-good-will-and-the-categorical-imperative.pdf

MAKE SURE ITS FROM THIS LINK ABOVE PLEASEEE^^

MAKE SURE THE QUOTES ARE FROM THAT ARTICLE LINK ABOVE AND THEN WRITE WHAT PAGE ITS ON!

I am writing a reflection paragraph about immanuel kant and the reflection is about why i agree with this philosopher the most.

STEP 1: Write me a very good thesis statement (or a few options I can pick from) that: declares an opinion, rather than an obvious fact, make sure the language in the thesis is clear enough for readers to understand, make sure the relationship between the topic sentence and the thesis is clear, make sure the thesis is focussed and narrow rather than vague and broad, make sure you have enough evidence to prove your thesis.

STEP 2: POINT PROOF EXPLANATION FORMAT:

Point- the supporting point of your thesis statement

Proof- to convince the reader that your point is true invalid you must apply at least one prove to convince them of your claim. Prove consist of both direct evidence (short and long quotations) and indirect evidence (observation and reason). The best argument combine both direct and indirect evidence.

Explanation- the relationship between your supporting points, and the proves that you offered to defend it is not obvious or automatic. Each proof, therefore, must be clearly explain so that it is relevant for the supporting point and more broadly the thesis becomes clear, to your reader. Also, be sure to show the relationship between proofs.

So pick three points to support your thesis, and then pick three proofs from immanuel Kants categorical imperative reading to support your points, and then, after each point, explain how old is proof supports the point (briefly with strong words)

So formatting should be like this

Point 1-

Proof (direct or indirect)-

Explain how this proof supports the point-

And repeat same for other two points.

STEP 3: CONCLUSION:

gently remind the reader of your thesis by paraphrasing it, using slightly different words for maintaining the original meaning (make sure it’s good)

then paraphrase, organizing points remind your reader of the three points you have developed to support your thesis. Also, be sure that the supporting points are repeated in the order that they appear in your reflective writing piece.

STEP FOUR: THEMATIC STATEMENT:

The thematic statement  compels your reader to consider why this topic is worthy of reflection what is a social, personal and political relevance? It’s a challenge, the reader to reconsider their views about the topic being addressed (answer the question: SO WHAT).

After you are finished, all of this, combine everything and write a reflective piece on it (you can add additional information to make it better)

You will write a four (4) paragraph essay explaining when progress turns into gentrification in Washington, DC. You will use your knowledge of the history of gentrification in D.C. to structure your essay.

Question Prompt: When does progress become gentrification?

Directions: Write a four paragraph essay. Make sure you have a historically defensible claim that responds to all parts of the question in the introduction. Use historical events to develop your argument. Utilize the content of at least four documents in your essay. Explain the significance of the author’s point of view, the historical time period, and for whom it was written (audience). You may provide broader evidence from outside this course to support the argument.

based on your additional research, should police departments employ predictive policing to reduce crime with limited resources? Be sure to carefully defend your response with reasons and consider an objection (which you respond to) before you conclude the argument.

My response: I agree that being a part of the white society is like the concept of invisible privilege that has a familiar simile in that it is analogous to an invisible weightless knapsack. This metaphor emphasizes that white privilege, even though it may not be immediately obvious, has considerable advantages and opportunities that may include a lot of benefits and freedom to life. White people benefit from the structures and institutions in which they live. In the same culture, they were trained to be oblivious to their benefits. The undeserved advantages that were created by white people made people of color feel as if they were being oppressed. It is a norm and dominating racial power to be white in this society. For instance, if a white person comes into a new neighborhood, they are fairly certain that the bulk of their neighbors are the same color as them. A person has no idea of the advantages they have until they put themselves in the shoes of other people of color. Peggy McIntosh said that white advantages don't originate from a fault in a single human or from a single individual using them. It is via an inherent fault in the system that white privilege is created. If we wish to effect systemic change, it must occur inside the system. Systems have a major impact on individual behavior in the social world. We may all do our part to hasten the end. McIntosh maintains that white people may see racism in a different way when something gives them an advantage over others, not because it benefits white people. Systemic oppressions have interactive and internalized characteristics. Teaching racism as an act rather than an overall system that advantages the dominant group makes it difficult for white people to see themselves as racists. Embedded systems can't be eliminated, the recognition of them is important. Change won't come from just being dissatisfied with the system. McIntosh's example offers many benefits for comprehending white privilege. There are many advantages to understanding white privilege as the McIntosh example demonstrates. While it is true that 'whiteness' is simply about skin color, the various definitions of race reveal that it is really much more than that. The fact that McIntosh refers to white advantage rather than non-white disadvantage when framing the discussion of race reinforces the overall idea that race should be seen in terms of advantage rather than disadvantage.

include

1. Introduction

-State thesis and summarize argument

-Define any key terms

2. Main Body

-Argument 1, Argument 2, Argument 3

3. Objection

-Response to objection

4. Conclusion

-Restate thesis/summarize your main arguments