2
answers
0
watching
190
views
lauerjazzlynLv1
9 Jan 2022
Michael is a politician who is lobbying for a conference to amend the Genocide Convention. Michael says that there are several problems with the act as it was written and wants to revisit it in light of more modern events. If the United Nations agreed to sponsor a meeting to amend the act, which outcome would Michael be MOST likely hoping for?
○ He would likely want the definition of genocide to be expanded and clarified.
○ He would likely want the definition of genocide to be narrowed.
○ He would likely ask that the UN be allowed to investigate acts of genocide.
○ He would likely want the charge of genocide to fall under crimes against humanity.
Michael is a politician who is lobbying for a conference to amend the Genocide Convention. Michael says that there are several problems with the act as it was written and wants to revisit it in light of more modern events. If the United Nations agreed to sponsor a meeting to amend the act, which outcome would Michael be MOST likely hoping for?
○ He would likely want the definition of genocide to be expanded and clarified.
○ He would likely want the definition of genocide to be narrowed.
○ He would likely ask that the UN be allowed to investigate acts of genocide.
○ He would likely want the charge of genocide to fall under crimes against humanity.
Read by 1 person
10 Jan 2022
Already have an account? Log in
