1
answer
0
watching
5
views
12 Dec 2019

This Is a Chemical Engineering question but that isnt among the subjects

Problem 4.39 Felder and Rouseeau Elementary Principles Of Chemical Processes 4th Edition

The hormone estrogen is produced in the ovaries of females and elsewhere in the body in men and post-menopausal women, and it is also administered in estrogen replacement therapy, a common treatment for women who have undergone a hysterectomy. Unfortunately, it also binds to estrogen receptors in breast tissue and can activate cells to become cancerous. Tamoxifen is a drug that also binds to estrogen receptors but does not activate cells, in effect blocking the receptors from access to estrogen and inhibiting the growth of breast-cancer cells. Tamoxifen is administered in tablet form. In the manufacturing process, a finely ground powder contains tamoxifen (tam) and two inactive fillers—lactose monohydrate (lac) and corn starch (cs). The powder is mixed with a second stream containing water and suspended solid particles of polyvinylpyrrolidone (pvp) binder, which keeps the tablets from easily crumbling. The slurry leaving the mixer goes to a dryer, in which 94.2% of the water fed to the process is vaporized. The wet powder leaving the dryer contains 8.80 wt% tam, 66.8% lac, 21.4% cs, 2.00% pvp, and 1.00% water. After some additional processing, the powder is molded into tablets. To produce a hundred thousand tablets, 17.13 kg of wet powder is required. (a) Taking a basis of 100,000 tablets produced, draw and label a process flowchart, labeling masses of individual components rather than total masses and component mass fractions. It is unnecessary to label the stream between the mixer and the dryer. Carry out a degree-of-freedom analysis of the overall two-unit process. (b) Calculate the masses and compositions of the streams that must enter the mixer to make 100,000 tablets. (c) Why was it unnecessary to label the stream between the mixer and the dryer? Under what circumstances would it have been necessary? (d) Go back to the flowchart of Part a. Without using the mass of the wet powder (17.13 kg) or any of the results from Part b in your calculations, determine the mass fractions of the stream components in the powder fed to the mixer and verify that they match your solution to Part b. (Hint: Take a basis of 100 kg of wet powder.) (e) Suppose a student does Part d before Part b, and re-labels the powder feed to the mixer on the flowchart of Part a with an unknown total mass (m1) and the three now known mole fractions. (Sketch the resulting flowchart.) The student then does a degree-of-freedom analysis, counts four unknowns (the masses of the powder, pvp, and water fed to the mixer, and the mass of water evaporated in the dryer), and six equations (five material balances for five species and the percentage evaporation), for a net of −2 degrees of freedom. Since there are more equations than unknowns, it should not be possible to get a unique solution for the four unknowns. Nevertheless, the student writes four equations, solves for the four unknowns, and verifies that all of the balance equations are satisfied. There must have been a mistake in the degree-of-freedom calculation. What was it?

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in