1
answer
0
watching
138
views

Considertwomodels for estimating, in advance of an election, the share of votes that will go to rival candidates. According to one model, pollsters surveys of a randomly chosen set of registered voters before an election can be used to forecast the percentage of votes that each candidate will receive. The first model relies on the assumption that unpaid survey respondents will give truthful responses about how they will vote and that they will cast a ballot in the election. The other model uses prices of financial assets (legally binding IOUs) issued by the Iowa Electronic Market, operated by the University of Iowa, to predict electoral outcomes. The final payments received by owners of these assets, which can be bought or sold during the weeks and days preceding an election, depending on the shares of votes the candidates end up receiving. The second model assumes that owners of these assets wish to earn the highest possible returns, and it indicates that the market prices of these assets indicate the percentage of votes that each candidate will receive on the day of the election.

  1. Which of these two models for forecasting electoral results is more firmly based on the rationality assumption of economic?
  1. How would an economist evaluate which is the better model for forecasting electoral outcomes?

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Insha Fatima
Insha FatimaLv10
28 Sep 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in

Related textbook solutions

Related questions

Weekly leaderboard

Start filling in the gaps now
Log in