The measurement of Li in brine is used by geochemists to help determine the origin of brine in oil fields. The analysis of replicate samples of a marine sediment sample gave the results shown below:
Sample Preparation [Li] Found in Original (Micrograms/g) Analytical Method 1. None 25.1 Standard Curve 2. Dilute to 1/10 with water 64.8 Standard Curve 3. Dilute to 1/10 with water 82.5 Standard Addition
a) suggest a reason for the increasing concentration of Li in samples 1 through 3
b) What value would you reccomend for the real concentration of Li in the sample and why?
c) Name an analytical method other than a calibration curve or standard addition that can be employed to obtain an accurate and precise measurement of Li in these marine sediment samples.
The measurement of Li in brine is used by geochemists to help determine the origin of brine in oil fields. The analysis of replicate samples of a marine sediment sample gave the results shown below:
Sample Preparation | [Li] Found in Original (Micrograms/g) | Analytical Method |
1. None | 25.1 | Standard Curve |
2. Dilute to 1/10 with water | 64.8 | Standard Curve |
3. Dilute to 1/10 with water | 82.5 | Standard Addition |
a) suggest a reason for the increasing concentration of Li in samples 1 through 3
b) What value would you reccomend for the real concentration of Li in the sample and why?
c) Name an analytical method other than a calibration curve or standard addition that can be employed to obtain an accurate and precise measurement of Li in these marine sediment samples.
For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.
Related textbook solutions
Basic Chemistry
Principles of Chemistry Molecular Approach
Principles of Chemistry Molecular Approach
Chemistry: Structure and Properties
Chemistry: A Molecular Approach
Chemistry: A Molecular Approach
Principles of Chemistry: A Molecular Approach
Chemistry: The Central Science
Related questions
1. Samples of drinking water were analyzed for lead contamination. Analysis of the drinking water showed a lead concentration of 12.54 ppb. Analysis of a sample of the same drinking water spiked with 20.00 ppb lead gave a concentration of 29.63 ppb. Calculate the spike recovery. Is the method sufficiently accurate?
2. A chemical technician wants to verify the precision of an analytical procedure used to determine citric acid concentration in orange juice. She obtains 10.00 mL of a particular orange juice and dilutes it to 100.00 mL with water. She then analyzes five aliquots of the solution with the following results:
Aliquot 1 12.33 mg/mL
Aliquot 2 12.59 mg/mL
Aliquot 3 11.89 mg/mL
Aliquot 4 12.11 mg/mL
Aliquot 5 11.71 mg/mL
What can you say about the precision based on these results? Should the method be certified?
3. Your company is interested in using a new, faster method to determine copper concentration in aqueous solutions. Before implementing the new method you must check it out to see if it is sufficiently accurate and precise. You also want to know how well the new method compares to the old method. To test the new method you obtain a lake water SRM that is certified to contain 0.0283 ± 0.0002 ppm copper and analyze it by both methods with the following results:
Copper concentration (ppm) | |
Old Method | New Method |
0.0235 | 0.0233 |
0.0240 | 0.0231 |
0.0239 | 0.0233 |
0.0236 | 0.0232 |
0.0240 | 0.0231 |
What can you say about the new method? Is it as good as the old? Is it better? Do the two methods yield essentially the same results? Is it sufficiently accurate to warrant changing to the new method? Back up your responses with statistical calculations.