PSYC0150 Lecture Notes - Breach (Security Exploit), Professional Boundaries

17 views7 pages

drashti2807

30 May 2023

School

Flinders University

Department

PSYC Psychology

Course

PSYC0150

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Law100 Assessment-1

Assessment 1: ACWA Code of Ethics Scenarios

Scenario-1:

A. COMPLIANT WITH ACWA CODE OF ETHICS:

There is no acknowledgment of Alice disrespecting confidentiality in this scenario, so

her actions are legal as per the code.

According to code 3.6 (Code of Ethics FOR CONSULTATION REVISED, 2021, p.4) Alice

meets the practice guidelines' expectations.

B. POTENTIALLY PROBLEMATIC OR NON-COMPLIANT WITH ACWA’S CODE OF ETHICS:

Alice's actions in discussing Betty's case in the reception area, where other clients

could hear, could be viewed as non-compliant.

Code 1.3 (Code of Ethics FOR CONSULTATION REVISED, 2021, p.3), mandates that

client privacy be always upheld.

Recommendation: According to codes 2.1 and 3.5 (Code of Ethics FOR

CONSULTATION REVISED, 2021, p.3), it is essential to keep Betty's information

private without compromising her client’s rights.

C. BREACH OF ACWA’S CODE OF ETHICS:

Discussing Betty's personal information in public may be viewed as a breach of

confidentiality. Community workers who breach the protocol may face disciplinary

action from the ACWA.

Recommendation: ACWA provides guidelines on how community workers should

conduct themselves in their professional practice and maintain the confidentiality of

customer information.

D. VALUES:

The dignity and inclusivity values of the DHSA are not reflected in this situation.

Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 7 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Law100 Assessment-1

Scenario-2:

A. COMPLIANT WITH ACWA CODE OF ETHICS:

There is no mention of Alice breaching confidentiality in this scenario, so her

actions are consistent with the code because she met Betty by chance at the

party.

B. POTENTIALLY PROBLEMATIC OR NON-COMPLIANT WITH ACWA’S CODE OF

ETHICS:

Alice's actions in posting pictures of her weekend party with Betty on Facebook

may be viewed as unprofessional.

Recommendation: According to code 1.6 (Code of Ethics FOR CONSULTATION

REVISED, 2021, p.3), always maintain professional boundaries with the client.

C. BREACH OF ACWA’S CODE OF ETHICS:

Facebook is not mentioned in the ACWA Code of Ethics, there is no breach here.

According to code 3.5 (Code of Ethics FOR CONSULTATION REVISED, 2021, p.4),

Alice is aware of her rights toward Betty, because she did not meet her with any

personal intentions.

D. VALUES:

The agency's values of client-centeredness and integrity are maintained here.

Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 7 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Scenario-1: compliant with acwa code of ethics: There is no acknowledgment of alice disrespecting confidentiality in this scenario, so her actions are legal as per the code. According to code 3. 6 (code of ethics for consultation revised, 2021, p. 4) alice meets the practice guidelines" expectations: potentially problematic or non-compliant with acwa"s code of ethics: Alice"s actions in discussing betty"s case in the reception area, where other clients could hear, could be viewed as non-compliant. Code 1. 3 (code of ethics for consultation revised, 2021, p. 3), mandates that client privacy be always upheld. Recommendation: according to codes 2. 1 and 3. 5 (code of ethics for. Consultation revised, 2021, p. 3), it is essential to keep betty"s information private without compromising her client"s rights: breach of acwa"s code of ethics: Discussing betty"s personal information in public may be viewed as a breach of confidentiality. Community workers who breach the protocol may face disciplinary action from the acwa.

Related Questions

1. Operational definition of social problem (what is the social problem you’d like to reduce? Provide operational definition of behavior which contribute to specific social problem of interest. Is this behavior we should increase or decrease?)

2. Description of Target society and environment (provide a description of the target society and environment)

3. Baseline data (provided a description of baseline data (included references to where you got this info )

4. Criterion for success (specific increase/decrease in which property of behavior)

5. Rational for change (ethical considerations,relative risk/benefit)

6. Potentially successful Interventions Plan (includes descriptions of any necessary assessments, maintenance plan and rationale for why the plan would work)

7. Necessary resources (costs, political support,others)

faithknox6

Procedural details:

The continuous EEG of thirteen unique participants were recorded over 12 experimental sessions. One participant took part twice. All participants natively spoke a language that made the [tha] versus [da] distinction.
Stimuli were natural productions of [tha] and [da]. Stimuli were produced by a native female speaker of North American English.
There was only one experimental block. The aspirated [tha] was the repeated standard and unaspirated [da] was the infrequent deviant.
Data from Fp1, Fp2, Cz and Fz were recorded.
Two mastoid channels were recorded and linked in post-processing to create an average mastoid reference.
The participants heard 60 repetitions of the deviant [da] and approximately 420 repetitions of the standard [tha]. This was a ratio of approximately seven standards for every deviant that was presented to the participant.
Offline, the data was epoched, with 100 ms before the presentation of the stimulus and 800 ms after the presentation of the stimulus.

Questions:

Consult EEG and speech processing. What kind of experimental design is this? How do you know?
Given the Procedural details above and course content, provide specific predictions for what you expect? Assume that the participants can contrast [tha] and [da].

Do you predict there to be differences?
If so, at what time points?
Which response do you anticipate to be more negative?
What is the unit of Time measurement on the x-axis in a plot based on the experiment?

Now imagine that the participants were speakers of a language that did not contrast [tha] and [da], e.g., Spanish or Russian. State explicitly your predictions along the same lines as the answer to Question 2.
According to the experiment/procedures, which predictions are met? Be specific. Make particular reference to the imaginary plot and identify any parts of the ERP responses that might be different between the two conditions.

Is this in the time window that you expect?
Is it in the appropriate direction? That is, is the response that is expected to be more positive, indeed more positive and the response that is expected to be more negative, indeed more negative? Also, did you expect to observe a more pronounced peak to the standard or to the deviant?

1. Can you conclude that the particular design is tapping into phonetic or phonological representations? Make specific reference to the potential levels of sound representations (e.g., acoustic, phonetic, phonological). Explain why you can or cannot conclude that this design taps into a specific level of representation.

Use references:

Kazanina, N., Phillips, C., & Idsardi, W. (2006). The influence of meaning on the perception of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(30), 11381-11386.
Phillips, et al. (2000). Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: an MEG mismatch study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 1038-1055.

astray

Hey, were you ever able to get these notes? I see that you put these up in 2020 I think and now it's 2022, maybe you graduated and you know the answers for them? unless they are new but I can't find any notes for these ones, its for PFP 101

35 multiple choice and true/false questions based on the M 9 \& 10 material. The student will have untimed and unlimited attempts with the HIGHEST mark taken. Please pay attention to the due date.

A) Several studies have concluded that both victims and offenders have high levels of satisfaction with RJ processes and outcomes.

B) RJ would be most effective in cases involving: youth in conflict with the law; first-time offenders; minor property offences; where the whole community is affected.

C) Amongst the potential benefits of RJ cited for victims are the opportunities it can provide to the victim to communicate with the offender who harmed them, should they wish to do 50.

D) Some of the central concerns for victims participating in RJ include risks of re-victimization or secondary victimization, pressure to participate, safety and confidentiality.

E) There is ongoing debate about the suitability of $\mathrm{R}$ in certain situations - for example, gender-based violence.

F) Usually victims are always given information about the RJ system and then decide not to use it and opt instead for the traditional method.

G) The government study conducted looked at 34 victims of serious crime in Canada and in The Netherlands.

H) The 'community' is clearly defined as the "sub-national government which has jurisdiction over the offence that took place."