PSY2102 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Income Statement, Earnings Before Interest And Taxes

7 views3 pages

mikey12

15 Apr 2023

School

Amity University - Mumbai

Department

Psychology

Course

PSY2102

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Capital and revenue receipts, differences between capital and revenue receipts. Capital receipts are given when a company makes an asset. Revenue receipts are given to you every year as a tax statement. This article explains the difference between capital receipts and revenue receipts. It talks about those receipts that are a part of revenue such as income from taxes, public borrowing, fees charges collected by the government, and income from public undertakings. It also discusses capital receipts such as the sale of assets and loans from abroad. ), other non-tax revenue (such as interest receipts, revenue from public enterprises, etc. ), and grants and loans given by other governments and institutions. The difference between capital and revenue receipts is based on the working of an expenditure. Capital receipts are the receipts that derive their value from the capital. In general, all bought assets are capital and the money paid to acquire such assets is known as capital receipts.

Related Questions

Step:1

Find ONE general-interest article on the internet (from .com, net, or do NOT use websites like the CDC, NHI or similar) that contains a negative view of MSG.

Look for ONE peer-reviewed journal article on MSG. If the internet article cites (or links) a research publication from a scholarly journal, you may locate and use it. Alternatively, you can find a peer-reviewed article using Google Scholar.

Step2:

1.BRIEFLY introduce the difference and/or similarity of claims you have found between the two sources. (cite and clearly signal the source (in the article__) so we know "which" is
"which").

2.Did the online article seem reliable at first glance? Have you detected any biases or lack of sources in the statements? Has your opinion changed AFTER screening the website using the pdf located in step 1? Why?

3.Consider the domain of analysis introduced in the pdf (authority, currency, functionality, accuracy, and objectivity).
What is the website source missing? Did you find the pdf useful?

yousefalry

*Please refer to the attached file to see the original question*

Imagine you are working for a community center that offers health, wellness, and relief services to all community members. The clientele is diverse and everyday you see people from all walks of life. One morning, a young man, Jeff, comes to the center for assistance. Jeff's shoes and clothes are ragged, his hair is washed, and he's thin. He stops to speak to Mary, the new front desk assistant. You notice Mary's facial

Later that morning you walk by the social services office. You see that Linda, the manager, has found Jeff a sandwich and some coffee. Linda is sitting beside him and helping him fill out paperwork. She touches him arm briefly before standing up to greet another client.

2. Initial Post: Create a new thread and answer all three arts of the initial prompt below

1. Reflect on what you know about social structure (which is made up of social institutions like the economy, family, and government). Explain how social structure plays a role in the lives of clients like Jeff.

2. Think about the interaction between Mary and Jeff. Explain how Mary's treatment of Jeff may impact his experience at the community center.

3. Think about the interaction between Linda and Jeff. List one potential positive outcome from Linda's treatment of Jeff.

Complete your Reply Posts by Sunday at 11:59 pm EST

3. Reply Posts: Reply to two people on different days.

To add to the academic conversation, reply to your classmates/instructor by introducing a new idea that applies personal experience(s) and/or new knowledge gained from either courseroom material(s) or research

b.sparks53

Procedural details:

The continuous EEG of thirteen unique participants were recorded over 12 experimental sessions. One participant took part twice. All participants natively spoke a language that made the [tha] versus [da] distinction.
Stimuli were natural productions of [tha] and [da]. Stimuli were produced by a native female speaker of North American English.
There was only one experimental block. The aspirated [tha] was the repeated standard and unaspirated [da] was the infrequent deviant.
Data from Fp1, Fp2, Cz and Fz were recorded.
Two mastoid channels were recorded and linked in post-processing to create an average mastoid reference.
The participants heard 60 repetitions of the deviant [da] and approximately 420 repetitions of the standard [tha]. This was a ratio of approximately seven standards for every deviant that was presented to the participant.
Offline, the data was epoched, with 100 ms before the presentation of the stimulus and 800 ms after the presentation of the stimulus.

Questions:

Consult EEG and speech processing. What kind of experimental design is this? How do you know?
Given the Procedural details above and course content, provide specific predictions for what you expect? Assume that the participants can contrast [tha] and [da].

Do you predict there to be differences?
If so, at what time points?
Which response do you anticipate to be more negative?
What is the unit of Time measurement on the x-axis in a plot based on the experiment?

Now imagine that the participants were speakers of a language that did not contrast [tha] and [da], e.g., Spanish or Russian. State explicitly your predictions along the same lines as the answer to Question 2.
According to the experiment/procedures, which predictions are met? Be specific. Make particular reference to the imaginary plot and identify any parts of the ERP responses that might be different between the two conditions.

Is this in the time window that you expect?
Is it in the appropriate direction? That is, is the response that is expected to be more positive, indeed more positive and the response that is expected to be more negative, indeed more negative? Also, did you expect to observe a more pronounced peak to the standard or to the deviant?

1. Can you conclude that the particular design is tapping into phonetic or phonological representations? Make specific reference to the potential levels of sound representations (e.g., acoustic, phonetic, phonological). Explain why you can or cannot conclude that this design taps into a specific level of representation.

Use references:

Kazanina, N., Phillips, C., & Idsardi, W. (2006). The influence of meaning on the perception of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(30), 11381-11386.
Phillips, et al. (2000). Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: an MEG mismatch study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 1038-1055.

astray

PSY2102 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Income Statement, Earnings Before Interest And Taxes

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

PSY2102 Lecture Notes - Capital Expenditure, Fixed Asset, Capital Allowance

PSY2102 Chapter Notes - Chapter 1-5: Statistical Inference, Descriptive Statistics, Summary Statistics

IT 1081C Lecture Notes - Lecture 18: Escheat, Capital Expenditure, Excise

Related Questions