LIFESCI 1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Spermophilus, Null Hypothesis

113 views3 pages
School
Department
Course
Professor
Chae Won Park
UID: 704407988
Section 1C
Introduction
When observing animals in their natural habitats, we can document behavior patterns specific to
the animal. In this laboratory, we studied two different species of squirrels, Beecheyi and
Variegatus, and compared their behaviors in snake scent application (SSA). Many researchers
have observed that ground squirrels, Beecheyi, and rock squirrels, Variegatus, chew up
rattlesnake skin and apply it to themselves by licking their fur. The reasons for doing this can be
tested with a couple testable hypotheses. Squirrels may use SSA as a defense mechanism to mask
their scent from predators, to attract another squirrel of the opposite sex for mating, or to ward
off other animals from taking up their resources or territory.(Clucas) For this laboratory, we
addressed the question, is SSA applied randomly over the squirrels’ bodies? Based on this
question, we made the null hypothesis that the squirrels apply the snake scent randomly on their
bodies. Thus, the hypothesis that we tested was that SSA is non-random. A logical prediction
that arises from this hypothesis would be that the squirrels apply snake scent on certain regions
of their bodies more than other regions of their bodies. For example, we can predict that the
squirrels apply more frequently to their tails and lower parts of the body because the movement
of the tail and hind legs will allow for more dissemination of the scent.
Methods
In this laboratory, we observed SSA behavior of two different species of squirrels, Beecheyi and
Variegatus, by watching videos of them chewing and applying the snake scent to their bodies.
After watching four videos of Beecheyi and four videos of Variegatus, we tallied how many
times the squirrels applied the scent on the following body regions: flank, head, front leg, hind
leg, and tail. (Life Science Core, UCLA. 2008-11)
Results
Species
Ind
Head
Tail
Flank
H.Leg
F.Leg
Total
S. beecheyi
1
0
2
0
0
0
2
2
0
3
0
2
0
5
3
0
2
1
1
0
4
4
0
1
1
1
0
3
Total
0
8
2
4
0
14
S. variegatus
1
0
4
0
0
0
4
2
0
2
6
3
0
11
3
0
7
5
0
0
12
4
0
2
0
0
0
2
Total
0
15
11
3
0
29
After observing the two species in multiple videos, we were able to see that the frequency of
SSA in both species was highest in the tail and flank area.
S. beecheyi
Head
Tail
H.Leg
F.Leg
Total
Expected
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
14
Observed
0
8
4
0
14
o-e
-2.8
5.2
1.2
-2.8
(o-e)^2
7.84
27.04
1.44
7.84
(o-e)^2/e
2.8
9.66
0.514
2.8
16.0
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers