CRM/LAW C122 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Deckchair, Fred Korematsu, Originalism

• School: UC-Irvine
• Department: Criminology, Law and Society
• Course: CRM/LAW C122
• Professor: Han

Document Summary

Lecture 4 (dred scott v. sandford) (korematsu v. us) Twane: t(cid:449)a(cid:374)(cid:374)ee sa(cid:455)s (cid:272)ott (cid:272)a(cid:374)"t sue at the time of constitutin blacks had no rights the technical thing was to dismiss but then the judge furthers it by. Asking if congress had power to say that slavery should exist in territories twannee whether constitution which passed missouri compromise to prohibit slavery: slavery fundamental right in constitution (as it is kind of. Ta(cid:374)e(cid:455)"s (cid:396)easo(cid:374)i(cid:374)g is a(cid:374) e(cid:454)a(cid:373)ple of o(cid:396)igi(cid:374)alis(cid:373) la(cid:272)ki(cid:374)g a (cid:396)e(cid:272)og(cid:374)itio(cid:374) of the i(cid:373)po(cid:396)ta(cid:374)(cid:272)e of natural law as the basis of the us constitution: he is relying on originalism of framers. The dred again position pro-life people appealing to the inhumanity to occurred. Roe an inhumane thing, which they claim is a repeat of dred scott another bad thing. But they are more interested in their philosophy. Eisegruber critiques this theory, by saying that taney is a positivist.