CRM/LAW C113 Lecture Notes - Lecture 7: Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act Of 2009, Civil Rights Act Of 1964, Walmart
24 Oct 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Q: in dukes v. walmart, the suprame court. According to the u. s. supreme court, the women in the class are too different from each other to warrant a class action so they did not even get to the evidence of the case. At first, the court ruled that was discrimination, but after the goodyear"s appeal, the court said that you can only collect for the discrimination that happened only 180 days before the lawsuit. Critically examine the notion of different choices made by men and women. Women were exposed to unwelcome behavior and sexual advances on the job that other employees were not subjected to. Employees have a right to work in an environment free from discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult . Meritor savings bank v. vinson (us supreme court 1986) Q: in meritor savings v. vinson, the court held: mr. taylor"s behavior was quid pro quo , mr. taylor"s work environment was hostile, mr. taylor"s .
