ECON 102 Lecture Notes - Lecture 9: North American Free Trade Agreement, Comparative Advantage, Import Quota

28 views3 pages

peachkoala371

21 Mar 2019

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Country has a comparative advantage in a good if it produces the good at lower opportunity cost than other countries. Countries can gain from trade if each exports the goods in which it has a comparative advantage. Pw = the world price of a good, price that prevails in world markets. Small economy is a price taker in world markets. When a small economy engages in free trade, pw is the only relevant price. No seller would accept less than pw since you could sell the good for pw in the world markets. No buyer would pay more than pw since you could buy the good for pw in world markets. Whether a good is imported or exported, trade creates winners and losers but the gains exceed the losses. Producers sell to a larger market, may achieve lower costs by producing on a larger scale. Competition from abroad may reduce market power of domestic firms, which would increase total welfare.

Related Questions

Suppose the market for oranges in a small country is closed to international trade. The domestic price is $3 per lb, at which 10,000 lbs are bought and sold in the country, while the world price is $4 per lb. If the country opens up to free trade with the world, the domestic quantity demanded at the world price will be 8,000 lbs, and the domestic quantity supplied at the world price will be 12,000 lbs.

A. Which of the following statements is true?

a. The country will become an importer of oranges because it has a comparative advantage in the production of oranges

b. The country will become an exporter of oranges because it has a comparative advantage in the production of oranges

c. The country will become an importer of oranges because the world has a comparative advantage in the production of oranges

d. The country will become an exporter of oranges because the world has a comparative advantage in the production of oranges

B. At what price (per lb.) will oranges be bought and sold in the country after opening up to trade?

a. $3

b. $4

c. $3.5

C. After opening up to trade, the level of exports/imports for the country will be:

a. 8,000 lbs.

b. 12,000 lbs.

c. 10,000 lbs.

d. 4,000 lbs.

D. How much (in $) is the net gain from trade for this country in opening up to free trade?

coralbadger702

Mention if the following statements are true or false. Explain clearly why, using ideas and concepts.

a. Under free trade, one country gains at the expense of the other.

b. The theory of comparative advantage states that free trade benefits all countries.

c. The Neo-classical trade theory states that trade arises due to different amounts of labor and capital in a country.

d. The H-O theory states that trade arises due to different PPFs in a country.

e. Under free trade, prices fall, so trade becomes easier.

f. A country should not have any imports and should increase exports if it wants to increase its employment levels.

g. Adam Smith recommended very strong government regulation of trade.

h. A country with higher labor productivity than another country will have a comparative advantage in the production of all goods.

i. The Theory of absolute advantage explains producer and consumer equilibriums under free trade.

j. Developed countries do not gain under free trade with developing countries.

skywasp336

what you think for this ? do you agree or disagree and why ?

I donât think itâs wise for nations to begin raising tariffs and increasing subsidies when we are faced with a global recession. If a smaller country raises tariffs on a good they are importing, it might not have that big effect on the global economy. However, if a country like China, Japan, United States etc. decide to raise tariffs on imports, it could lead to a global increase in the average tariffs. In the article âBarriers to entry: A rise in protectionism would worsen the already grim outlook for world trade,â it talks about the worldwide average for tariffs. In 1986 they average 26%. If the big economies of the world start increasing tariffs, the rest of the world will eventually follow, leading to a global increase on tariffs. A rise in the tariffs would slow down the global economy even more in the long run. In the article it mentions how trade has picked up immensely when tariffs are lower, and the world GDP was higher compared to when tariffs are increased because countries are more willing to trade. I think theyâre still benefits to be gained from trade even when a global recession may be taking place. If tariffs are increased, countries might try to specialize in goods where they donât have a comparative advantage in. Instead of trading for that good, they will try to produce it domestically. The opportunity cost of choosing to specialize in a good when they donât have comparative advantage is using those resources elsewhere. Perhaps for producing a good they do have comparative advantage in. Also a decline in trade because of rising tariffs means firms wouldnât be able to benefit from economies of scale.

ECON 102 Lecture Notes - Lecture 9: North American Free Trade Agreement, Comparative Advantage, Import Quota

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

ECON 102 Lecture Notes - Lecture 9: Market Power, International Trade, Comparative Advantage

ECON 102 Chapter Notes - Chapter 9: Economic Surplus, Invisible Hand, Comparative Advantage

ECON 102 Chapter 3: Economics 102 Chapter 3

Related Questions