PHIL 27000 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Immanuel Kant, Hypothetical Imperative, Categorical Imperative

38 views2 pages

Document Summary

Consequences does not matter when evaluating one"s action. Mill: difference between human and animal is capacity for higher pleasures. Kant: different is rationality- a person is capable of being guided by reason. Mill: any person sould potentially be sacrificed" for the happiness of all. Mill: the point" of human life is to be happy, as happy as possible (not. Kant: no person can be treated merely as a means to an end just for self though) Kant: the point" of human like is to be autonomous. Moral law expresses categorical imperative- tells us what we must do, regardless of whatever goal we might have. Universal law formulation - act only in accordance with the maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law treat others the way you want to be treated. Hypothetical imperative- tell us what actions we must take to achieve a goal.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents