ECON 1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Talc, Problem Solving, Knowledge Base

26 views22 pages
28 Oct 2020
School
Department
Course
Professor
Missing:
Process monitoring
Positive (Near vs far) & negative transfer (analogy)
General info about problem
Problem solving requires the following:
1) there are two states of affairs;
2) the agent is in one talc and wants to be in the other state;
3) it is not apparent to the agent how the gap between the two states is to be bridged
4) bridging the gap is a con consciously guided multi-step process.
Well-defined problems all aspects of the problem are clearly specified (= initial state, goal,
methods available) (e.g. maze or chess)
Used in research as there is an optimal strategy and errors/deficiencies can easily be
identified
The goal is well specified lied because it is clear when it has been reached
planning is much less necessary with well-defined problems
Ill-defined problems definition of problem is underspecified, initial state, goal state & methods
unclear (e.g. keys locked in car)
Most everyday problems
Knowledge-rich problems can only be solved with considerable amounts of prior knowledge
Knowledge-lean problems can be solved without prior knowledge as necessary info is provided
by problem statement
Most traditional research on problem solving involved knowledge-lean problems because
such problems minimise individual differences in relevant knowledge
UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM
Understanding= that you have constructed a mental representation of the problem, based on the
information provided in the problem and your own previous experience (Robertson, 2001).
In order to understand a problem, you need to construct an accurate mental representation
PAYING ATTENTION TO IMPORTANT INFORMATION
To understand a problem, you need to decide which information is most relevant to the problem’s
solution and then attend to that information.
Attention: important in understanding problems because attention is limited, and competing
thoughts can produce divided attention
focusing on the appropriate part: decided which information is essential and which can be
disregarded
attention is a necessary initial component of understanding a problem
METHODS OF REPRESENTING THE PROBLEM
choose an inappropriate method: you might not reach an effective solution to the problem
find an effective representation: you can organize the information efficiently and reduce the
strain on your limited working memory.
o more likely to select a useful strategy
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 22 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
SYMBOLS
Sometimes the most effective way to represent an abstract problem is by using symbols
Challenges: problem solvers often make mistakes when they try to translate words into symbols
o translating sentences into symbols is that the problem solver may oversimplify the sentence,
thereby misrepresenting the information
MATRICES
Matrix: a chart that shows all possible combinations of items.
excellent way to keep track of items, particularly if the problem is complex and if the relevant
information is categorical
especially suitable when the information is stable, rather than changing over time
DIAGRAMS
useful when you want to represent a large amount of information.
hierarchical tree diagram: figure that uses a tree-like structure to specify various possible
options in a problem.
o especially helpful in showing the relationship between categorized items
Advantage:
o can represent complicated information in a clear, concrete form, so that you have more
“mental space” in working memory for other problem-solving activities
o diagrams attracted people’s eye movements to relevant areas of the diagram, helping them
solve problems more successfully
VISUAL IMAGES
advantages:
o can let us escape from the boundaries of traditional, concrete representations.
o provide an advantage when a problem requires you to construct a figure
SITUATED COGNITION: THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXT
situated-cognition= argue that our ability to solve a problem is tied into the specific context in which
we learned to solve that problem (Lave, 1997; Robertson, 2001; Seifert, 1999).
The traditional cognitive approach to thinking emphasizes the processes that take place inside an
individual person’s head.
The situated-cognition approach argues that the traditional cognitive approach is too simplistic
situated-cognition perspective has important implications for education:
o suggests that children should have experience in solving authentic math problems that they
are likely to encounter outside a school setting.
o suggests that college students can learn especially effectively during internships and other
practical settings
ecological validity= conditions in which the research is conducted are similar to the natural
setting in which the results will be applied.
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 22 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
One important principle of the situated-cognition: people learn skills within the context of a
specific situation, such as a grocery store.
How do we solve problems?
PROBLEM SOLVING CYCLE
Problem identification: Do we actually have a problem?
Problem definition and representation: What exactly is our problem?
Strategy formulation: How can we solve the problem? The strategy may involve
o Analysis= breaking down the whole of a complex problem into manageable
elements. Instead, or perhaps in addition
o Synthesis= putting together various elements to arrange them into something
useful.
o Another pair of complementary strategies involves divergent and convergent
thinking.
divergent thinking= try to generate a diverse assortment of possible
alternative solutions to a problem.
convergent thinking= narrow down the multiple possibilities to converge on
a single best answer.
Organization of information: How do the various pieces of information in the problem fit
together?
Resource allocation: How much time, effort, money, etc., should I put into this problem?
Monitoring: Am I on track as I proceed to solve the problem?
Evaluation: Did I solve the problem correctly?
THEORIES
GESTALT APPROACH
Early research on problem solving was dominated by the Gestaltists
Trial-and-error learning a solution is reached by producing fairly random responses rather than
by a process of thought
Reproductive thinking re-use of previous experiences/ knowledge to solve a current problem
(Thorndike’s cat experiment)
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 22 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Positive (near vs far) & negative transfer (analogy) Used in research as there is an optimal strategy and errors/deficiencies can easily be identified. The goal is well specified lied because it is clear when it has been reached. Planning is much less necessary with well-defined problems. Ill-defined problems definition of problem is underspecified, initial state, goal state & methods unclear (e. g. keys locked in car) Most everyday problems: knowledge-rich problems can only be solved with considerable amounts of prior knowledge, knowledge-lean problems can be solved without prior knowledge as necessary info is provided by problem statement. Most traditional research on problem solving involved knowledge-lean problems because such problems minimise individual differences in relevant knowledge. Understanding= that you have constructed a mental representation of the problem, based on the information provided in the problem and your own previous experience (robertson, 2001). In order to understand a problem, you need to construct an accurate mental representation.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents