ECON 20 Lecture 10: Introductory_Economics_-_10

7 views2 pages
19 May 2020
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

No because i assumed to know all the info at beg. Turbo charger wouldn"t the larger firms invest more because they have more to gain. They have more incentive to do so than the smaller firms, greater payout. Even though you"re taking all their money, they chose you because you"re better. Alcoa, because they were passing on their gains to the consumers, they were seen as bad. If how to do things right was known, who would continue to do it. Seeing shirking doesn"t mean you"re inefficient, it means net of those costs, you"re more efficient. Could a cooperative (collusive) agreement that resulted in lower costs (say, by reducing risk) generate better results for consumers: the point of comp is to see who i can best cooperate with. I want you guys to compete for my business because i want to see which one of you guys match me better: ex.

Get access

Grade+
$40 USD/m
Billed monthly
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
10 Verified Answers
Class+
$30 USD/m
Billed monthly
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
7 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions